Matrix transmission coefficient

amjad-sh
Messages
240
Reaction score
13
TL;DR
I'm working in a paper, in which the transmission coefficient ##\hat t_k## is written in a matrix form.
To check out if my work is right, I want to calculate ##t_kt_k^*##. It must be less than 1.
The problem is that the transmission coefficient in the case I'm working on is in matrix form,it is not a number.
The Hamiltonian of the system I'm working on is in the form :
##\hat H=\dfrac{p^2}{2m}-\dfrac{\partial_z^2}{2m}+V(z)+\gamma V'(z)(\hat z \times \vec{\mathbf p})\cdot \vec{\sigma}##
There is translational symmetry in the x-y plane.
##\vec{\mathbf{p}}## is the two dimensional momentum in the x,y plane.
##-\dfrac{\partial_z^2}{2m}## is the kinetic energy in the z direction.
##\gamma V'(z)(\hat z \times \vec{\mathbf p})\cdot \vec{\sigma}## is the spin orbit coupling correction term.
##V(z)=V\theta(z)##

The solution of this problem may be solved to be:

##\vec{\varphi_{k\sigma}}(z)=
\begin{cases}
(e^{ikz}+\hat r_ke^{-ikz})\chi_{\sigma} & \text{if } z < 0 \\
\hat t_ke^{ik'z}\chi_{\sigma} & \text{if } z> 0
\end{cases} ##

according to the paper##\hat r_k## and ##\hat t_k## are the matrix reflection and transmission coefficients respectively.

Where ##\hat r_k=r_0\sigma_0 +\mathbf{\hat r} \cdot \vec{\sigma}##
and ## \hat t_k=t_0\sigma_0 +\mathbf{\hat t} \cdot \vec{\sigma}##

and ##\vec{\sigma}## is the vector of pauli matrices.

##\mathbf{\hat r}##and ##\mathbf{\hat t}## are spin flip operators.

as you can see the transmission and reflection coefficients are in matrix form.
so what I should do in this case? can we generalize the transmission coefficient to be in matrix form?and how I can use it physically?
you can check the paper in the attachment file(second section).
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
amjad-sh said:
To check out if my work is right, I want to calculate ##t_kt_k^*##. It must be less than 1. [...]
as you can see the transmission and reflection coefficients are in matrix form.
so what I should do in this case? can we generalize the transmission coefficient to be in matrix form?
You can still form ##t_kt_k^*##, using the conjugate transpose for the adjoint. It is Hermitian positive definite, hence its eigenvalues are real. The condition is now that all eigenvalues must be less than 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amjad-sh

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K