Undergrad How to picture the vector potential?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rick16
  • Start date Start date
Rick16
Messages
158
Reaction score
46
TL;DR
developing the Lorentz force law from the Lagrangian for the magnetic field
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##.

I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt} =\frac {dA_x} {dx} \frac {dx} {dt}##, ignoring the other terms. How can I know that each component of the vector potential depends on all the coordinates? I would have to somehow picture the vector potential in order to come to this conclusion, but the vector potential seems to be a purely theoretical construct. How can I know how to treat it in situations like this one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, in the general case ##\mathbf{A} = \mathbf{A}(x,y,z,t)## is some vector field that depends on position (and time), and you'll need to use the full total derivative, e.g.

##\dot{A}_x = (\partial_x A_x) \dot{x} + (\partial_y A_x) \dot{y} + (\partial_z A_x) \dot{z} + (\partial_t A_x)##

If the field changes with time, then ##\partial_t \mathbf{A}## will also be non-zero.

Why don't you have a look at a few concrete examples, e.g. wires, solenoids...:
https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_14.html
 
  • Like
Likes Dale and PeroK
Thank you, I think I got it. If I have any vector field ##\vec v=\vec v(x,y,z)##, then in general the componentes would be ##v_x =v_x(x,y,z), v_y=v_y(x,y,z), v_z=v_z(x,y,z)##, and only in a special case would I have ##v_x=v_x(x), v_y=v_y(y), v_z=v_z(z)##. If I don't know what a vector field actually looks like, I have to assume the general case. For some reason, I assumed ##v_x=v_x(x), v_y=v_y(y), v_z=v_z(z)##, and it already seems strange to me why I assumed that. Sorry to have bothered you with this.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale and ergospherical

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
618
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
659
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
994
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
510
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K