MHB How to prove an ideal of a ring R which is defined as a coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinates Ring
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Hi Everyone,

I am wondering how to prove an ideal of a ring $R$ which is defined as a coordinates. Let $R$ be the ring of $\mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z}$. Let $I={(a,a)| a\in \mathbb{Z}}$. I determine that the $I$ is a subring of $R$. Next step is to show the multiplication between the elements of $R$ and $I$. But I have read in the book that I need worried about the elements of $R$ and not just $I$. Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Cbarker1,

Assuming that multiplication in $R$ is defined as $(a_{1},a_{2})\cdot (b_{1},b_{2}) = (a_{1}b_{1},a_{2}b_{2}),$ $I$ is not an ideal of $R$. For example $(1,0)\cdot(a,a) = (a,0)\notin I$ for any $a\neq 0$.
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...