[ [(p-->q) and (r-->s)] and (~q or ~s) ] --> (~p or ~r)(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I know all basic theories in Logic and I want to know the correct way/correct steps of proving this kind of things? I'm a beginner.. please help

I can explain above dilemma in words, but I have no idea how to write down the proof correctly.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# How to prove Distractive dilemma ?

Loading...

Similar Threads - prove Distractive dilemma | Date |
---|---|

I Prove if x + (1/x) = 1 then x^7 + (1/x^7) = 1. | Mar 9, 2016 |

I Proving Odd and Even | Feb 13, 2016 |

Prove A.(B+C) = (A.B)+(A.C) <Boolean Algebra> | Oct 24, 2015 |

Something like the Monty Hall Dilemma | Feb 12, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**