How to separate variables in this PDE?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BB711
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pde Variables
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the partial differential equation (PDE) given by F,x,t + A(x)*F(x,t)*[(x+t)^(-3/2)] = 0, where A(x) is a known function of x. The user attempts to separate the function F(x,t) into components F1(x), F2(t), and F3(x+t). Suggestions include changing variables to (\zeta, \eta) = (x, x + t) and using the Ansatz F = H(\eta)Z(\zeta), leading to a transformed equation. However, the user expresses uncertainty about the separability of the resulting equation and seeks further guidance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with the method of separation of variables
  • Knowledge of variable transformations in PDEs
  • Proficiency in using LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the method of separation of variables in PDEs
  • Research variable transformations and their applications in solving PDEs
  • Learn about the implications of using the Ansatz in PDE solutions
  • Study the analytical solutions of PDEs with known coefficients
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working on partial differential equations, particularly those interested in analytical methods for solving complex PDEs.

BB711
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Can anyone suggest a way to separate the variables in this PDE, so I can solve it analytically?
My PDE:
F,x,t + A(x)*F(x,t)*[(x+t)^(-3/2)] = 0

A(x) is a known function of x.
Trying to separate F(x,t) like
F(x,t) = F1(x)*F2(t)*F3(x+t).

I’m getting desperate to solve,
any suggestions??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Make the change of variable (\zeta, \eta) = (x, x + t). Then the Ansatz F = H(\eta)Z(\zeta) yields <br /> H&#039;(\eta)Z&#039;(\zeta) + H&#039;&#039;(\eta)Z(\zeta) + A(\zeta)H(\eta)Z(\zeta)\eta^{-3/2} = 0. I'm not sure this is separable.
 
Thanks pasmith,
I did try something like that, and basically got that same type of equation, but I’m not sure what to do with it next. Still searching…
 
It wwould surely be easier to parse in ##LaTeX##
 
F_{,x,t} + \frac{A(x)}{(x+t)^{3/2}} F(x,t) = 0

A(x) is messy but known; F(x,t) must be solved for analytically, through separability or any other way.
 
Last edited:
What is ##F_{,x,t} ##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn
Common notation, F_{,x,t} \equiv \frac{\partial ^{2} F(x,t)}{\partial x \partial t}
 
Wow I've never seen it with the commas. OK thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K