How to Simplify (3.25) using Rodrigues Formula and Evaluate the Derivative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill Foster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jackson
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the simplification of an expression from Jackson's work, specifically transitioning from Equation 3.25 to Equation 3.26 using Rodrigues' formula. The context is within the subject area of mathematical physics, focusing on the properties of Legendre polynomials.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of Rodrigues' formula to simplify the integral in Equation 3.25. There are attempts to evaluate derivatives and manipulate sums, with some questioning how to eliminate certain terms from the summation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants providing insights and suggestions for re-evaluating the approach. Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of the binomial expansion and the limits of summation, indicating a lack of consensus on the method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of potential typos in the original equations, and participants are grappling with the implications of odd and even values of the variable l on the summation limits and the overall expression.

Bill Foster
Messages
334
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How do you get from (3.25) to (3.26) in Jackson?

Homework Equations



Equation 3.25:

[tex] A_l=\left(2l+1\right)\int_0^1P_l\left(x\right)dx[/tex]

Equation 3.26:

[tex] A_l=\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)^{\frac{l-1}{2}}\frac{\left(2l+1\right)\left(l-2\right)!}{2\left(\frac{l+1}{2}\right)!}[/tex]

Rodriques:

[tex] P_l\left(x\right)=\frac{1}{2^l l!}\frac{d^l}{dx^l}\left(x^2-1\right)^l[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Put Rodrigues into (3.25):

[tex] A_l=\frac{\left(2l+1\right)}{2^l l!}\int_0^1\frac{d^l}{dx^l}\left(x^2-1\right)^ldx[/tex]

Evaluate:

[tex] \frac{d^l}{dx^l}\left(x^2-1\right)^l[/tex]

[tex] =\frac{d^l}{dx^l}\sum_k{\left(\frac{l!}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)\left(x^2\right)^{l-k}\left(-1\right)^k}[/tex]

We worked this out in class, and somehow that sum goes away. But I forgot how.

As I work out the derivatives, I end up with:

[tex] =\sum_k{\left(\frac{l!}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2\left(l-k\right)\left(2\left(l-k\right)-1\right)\left(2\left(l-k\right)-2\right)\left(2\left(l-k\right)-3\right)...\left(2\left(l-k\right)-\left(l-1\right)\right)x^{l-2k}\left(-1\right)^k[/tex]

Any value of [tex]k>\frac{l}{2}[/tex] and the expression is zero. So the sum only goes from [tex]k=0[/tex] to [tex]\frac{l-1}{2}[/tex].

How do I get rid of that sum completely?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bill Foster said:
Equation 3.26:

[tex] A_l=\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)^{\frac{l-1}{2}}\frac{\left(2l+1\right)\left(l-2\right)!}{2\left(\frac{l+1}{2}\right)!}[/tex]

Looks like Jackson contains a typo; this should should be:

[tex] A_l=(-1)^{l-1}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{\frac{l-1}{2}}\frac{\left(2l+1\right)\left(l-2\right)!}{2\left(\frac{l+1}{2}\right)!}[/tex]
Evaluate:

[tex] \frac{d^l}{dx^l}\left(x^2-1\right)^l[/tex]

[tex] =\frac{d^l}{dx^l}\sum_k{\left(\frac{l!}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)\left(x^2\right)^{l-k}\left(-1\right)^k}[/tex]

We worked this out in class, and somehow that sum goes away. But I forgot how.

You've messed up the binomial expansion; you should have:

[tex] =\frac{d^l}{dx^l}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}{\left(\frac{l!}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)x^{2k}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]
 
That still doesn't get rid of the sum. It only gets rid of the values [tex]k=0[/tex] to [tex]k=\frac{l-1}{2}[/tex].
 
Okay, so that leaves you with

[tex]A_l=\frac{2l+1}{2^ll!}\sum_{k=\frac{l-1}{2}}^\infty\frac{l!}{k!(l-k)!}}(-1)^{l-k}\int_0^1\frac{d^l}{dx^l}(x^{2k})dx[/tex]

Now, I think what you want to do is make the substitution [itex]j=k-\frac{l-1}{2}[/itex]...
 
Last edited:
[tex]\frac{d^l}{dx^l}\sum_{k=0}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)x^{2k}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]

Differentiate once (1st time):

[tex]\frac{d^{l-1}}{dx^{l-1}}\sum_{k=0}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2kx^{2k-1}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]

Differentiate again (2nd time):

[tex]\frac{d^{l-2}}{dx^{l-2}}\sum_{k=0}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)x^{2k-2}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]

Differentiate again (third time):

[tex]\frac{d^{l-3}}{dx^{l-3}}\sum_{k=0}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)x^{2k-3}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]

...
...

Differentiate lth time:

[tex]\frac{d^{l-l}}{dx^{l-l}}\sum_{k=0}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)...(2k-(l-1))x^{2k-l}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]

That leaves me with:

[tex]\sum_{k=0}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)...(2k-(l-1))x^{2k-l}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]

Now, if [tex]k=0[/tex], the whole expression is zero. So we can rewrite it as:

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)...(2k-(l-1))x^{2k-l}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]

But if [tex]k=\frac{1}{2}[/tex], then the expression is also zero. But k can only be an integer. However, due to the term [tex]2k-2[/tex], if [tex]k=1[/tex] the expression is zero. So rewrite as:

[tex]\sum_{k=2}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)...(2k-(l-1))x^{2k-l}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]

Now let's just cut to the chase:

[tex](2k-(l-1)[/tex]

If [tex]k=\frac{l-1}{2}[/tex] or less, the expression is zero.

So rewrite as:

[tex]\sum_{k=\frac{l-1}{2}+1}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)...(2k-(l-1))x^{2k-l}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]

Which can be written as:

[tex]\sum_{k=\frac{l+1}{2}}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)...(2k-(l-1))x^{2k-l}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]

That only works if l is odd. If l is even, then it would be written as:

[tex]\sum_{k=\frac{l}{2}}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)...(2k-(l-1))x^{2k-l}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]

So we have the following:

[tex]A_l=\frac{\left(2l+1\right)}{2^l l!}\int_0^1\frac{d^l}{dx^l}\left(x^2-1\right)^ldx[/tex]
[tex]=\frac{\left(2l+1\right)}{2^l l!}\int_0^1\sum_{k=\frac{l}{2}}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)...(2k-(l-1))x^{2k-l}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}dx[/tex]
[tex]=\frac{\left(2l+1\right)}{2^l l!}\sum_{k=\frac{l}{2}}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)...(2k-(l-1))\left(-1\right)^{l-k}\int_0^1x^{2k-l}}dx[/tex] for even l
[tex]=\frac{\left(2l+1\right)}{2^l l!}\sum_{k=\frac{l+1}{2}}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)...(2k-(l-1))\left(-1\right)^{l-k}\int_0^1x^{2k-l}}dx[/tex] for odd l

Now: [tex]\int_0^1x^{2k-l}dx=\frac{1}{2k-l+1}x^{2k-l+1}[/tex] evaluated from 1 to 0:

That would equal:

[tex]\int_0^1x^{2k-l}dx=\frac{1}{2k-l+1}[/tex]

So now we have:

[tex]A_l=\frac{\left(2l+1\right)}{2^l l!}\sum_{k=\frac{l}{2},\frac{l+1}{2}}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)...(2k-(l-1))\left(-1\right)^{l-k}\frac{1}{2k-l+1}[/tex]

Which can be written as:

[tex]A_l=\frac{\left(2l+1\right)}{2^l l!}\sum_{k=\frac{l}{2},\frac{l+1}{2}}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)...(2k-(l-2))\left(-1\right)^{l-k}[/tex]

Now I still have that sum.

smiley-bangheadonwall.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You might want to re-read my last post; summing over [itex]j[/itex] instead of [itex]k[/itex] will probably make things easier for you...
 
gabbagabbahey said:
You might want to re-read my last post; summing over [itex]j[/itex] instead of [itex]k[/itex] will probably make things easier for you...

I don't see how. It changes the limits on the sum:

[tex]A_l=\frac{\left(2l+1\right)}{2^l l!}\sum_{j=1}^{\frac{l+1}{2}}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)2k(2k-1)(2k-2)...(2k-(l-2))\left(-1\right)^{l-k}[/tex]

And all the k's become more complicated:

[tex]A_l=\frac{\left(2l+1\right)}{2^l l!}\sum_{j=1}^{\frac{l+1}{2}}{\left(\frac{l !}{\left(j+\frac{l-1}{2}\right)!\left(l-\left(j+\frac{l-1}{2}\right)\right)!}\right)2\left(j+\frac{l-1}{2}\right)(2\left(j+\frac{l-1}{2}\right)-1)(2\left(j+\frac{l-1}{2}\right)-2)...(2\left(j+\frac{l-1}{2}\right)-(l-2))\left(-1\right)^{l-\left(j+\frac{l-1}{2}\right)}[/tex]
 
Why are you summing from [itex]j=1[/itex] to [itex]j=(l+1)/2[/itex]?:confused:

You started out with something like

[tex]A_l=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k\int_0^1\frac{d^l}{dx^l}x^{2k}dx=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k\left.\left[\frac{d^{l-1}}{dx^{l-1}}x^{2k}\right]\right|_0^1[/tex]

The terms for which [itex]2k<l-1[/itex] are all zero, and [itex]l[/itex] is odd (Remember, Jackson showed the [itex]A_l=0[/itex] for even [itex]l[/itex], so this sum is just to determine the odd coefficients), So the first [itex]\frac{l-1}{2}-1[/itex] terms of the sum are zero and you are left with:

[tex]A_l=\sum_{k=\frac{l-1}{2}}^{\infty}c_k\left.\left[\frac{d^{l-1}}{dx^{l-1}}x^{2k}\right]\right|_0^1[/tex]

So the substitution [itex]j=k-\frac{l-1}{2}[/itex]should give you

[tex]A_l=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}c_{j+\frac{l-1}{2}}\left.\left[\frac{d^{l-1}}{dx^{l-1}}x^{2j+l-1}\right]\right|_0^1=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}c_{j+\frac{l-1}{2}}\left.\left[(2j+l-1)(2j+l-2)\ldots(2j+1)x^{2j}\right]\right|_0^1=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}c_{j+\frac{l-1}{2}}\frac{(2j+l-1)!}{(2j)!}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
The sum doesn't go to infinity. Using k as the index variable, it goes from 0 to l:

[tex] \frac{d^l}{dx^l}\sum_{k=0}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)x^{2k}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]
 
  • #10
No, it goes to infinity. You need to review the binomial expansion.

[tex](x^2-1)^l=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)x^{2k}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}\neq\sum_{k=0}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)x^{2k}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]
 
  • #11
gabbagabbahey said:
No, it goes to infinity. You need to review the binomial expansion.

[tex](x^2-1)^l=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)x^{2k}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}\neq\sum_{k=0}^{l}{\left(\frac{l !}{k!\left(l-k\right)!}\right)x^{2k}\left(-1\right)^{l-k}}[/tex]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem
 
  • #12
gabbagabbahey said:
Why are you summing from [itex]j=1[/itex] to [itex]j=(l+1)/2[/itex]?

Because if [tex]k=\frac{l-1}{2}[/tex], that term is zero. So the sum has to start at [tex]k=\frac{l+1}{2}[/tex].

If [tex]j=k-\frac{l-1}{2}[/tex], then the first term for j is when [tex]k=\frac{l+1}{2}[/tex]:

[tex]j=k-\frac{l-1}{2} = \frac{l+1}{2}-\frac{l-1}{2} = 1[/tex].

The last term is [tex]k = l[/tex]

So [tex]j=k-\frac{l-1}{2} = l-\frac{l-1}{2} = \frac{l+1}{2}[/tex]
 
  • #13
Bill Foster said:

Contrary to popular belief, wikipedia is not always the most accurate source for information.

Try this link instead. Or, better yet, break out your old calculus textbook.

Edit: After my morning cup of coffee, I realized that there is nothing wrong with only summing up to [itex]k=l[/itex]. However, the sum can be extended to infinity since [tex]\begin{pmatrix}l\\k\end{pmatrix}[/tex] is zero for [itex]k>l[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • #14
gabbagabbahey said:
Contrary to popular belief, wikipedia is not always the most accurate source for information.

Try this link instead. Or, better yet, break out your old calculus textbook.

I would like to direct your attention to equation 2 in that link, and the text that immediately precedes it.

Edit: After my morning cup of coffee, I realized that there is nothing wrong with only summing up to [itex]k=l[/itex]. However, the sum can be extended to infinity since [tex]\begin{pmatrix}l\\k\end{pmatrix}[/tex] is zero for [itex]k>l[/itex].

It would only go to infinity if l goes to infinity.
 
  • #15
Anyways, can you agree that

[tex]A_l=-\frac{2l+1}{2^l}\sum_{j=0}^{j=\frac{l+1}{2}}\frac{(-1)^j(2j+l-1)!}{(j+\frac{l-1}{2})!(\frac{l+1}{2}-j)!(2j)!}[/tex]

?
 
  • #16
gabbagabbahey said:
Anyways, can you agree that

[tex]A_l=-\frac{2l+1}{2^l}\sum_{j=0}^{j=\frac{l+1}{2}}\frac{(-1)^j(2j+l-1)!}{(j+\frac{l-1}{2})!(\frac{l+1}{2}-j)!(2j)!}[/tex]

?

It looks clearer written in terms of k.
 
  • #17
Since [itex]l[/itex] is odd, make the substitution [itex]l=2n+1[/itex]...
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K