MHB How to Solve a Log Equation with Different Bases?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Solve the log equation

log_16 (3x-1)=log_4 (3x) + log_4 (0.5)

Can someone get me started?

The left side has base 16 and the right side base 4.

How is this done when two different bases are involved?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
By definition of logarithm, $\log_{16}x$ is the number $a$ such that $16^a=x$. Note that $16^a=(4^2)^a=4^{2a}$. Therefore, if $\log_{16}x=a$, then $\log_4x=2a=2\log_{16}x$.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
By definition of logarithm, $\log_{16}x$ is the number $a$ such that $16^a=x$. Note that $16^a=(4^2)^a=4^{2a}$. Therefore, if $\log_{16}x=a$, then $\log_4x=2a=2\log_{16}x$.

I don't get it.
 
The quality of information you'll get as help is proportional to how much you reveal about what you understand, where the difficulty is for you and why.
 
RTCNTC said:
Solve the log equation

log_16 (3x-1)=log_4 (3x) + log_4 (0.5)

Can someone get me started?

The left side has base 16 and the right side base 4.

How is this done when two different bases are involved?
Do you know what "log_16" means? In particular, do you know that, for any positive x, if y= log_16(x) then x= 16^y? Of course 16= 4^2 so x= (4^2)^y= 4^(2y).

Now, take the logarithm base 4: since x= 4^(2y), 2y= log_4(x) so y= (1/2) log_4(x).

You can replace "log_16(3x- 1)" with "(1/2)log_4(3x- 1)" and have the same base:
(1/2)log_4(3x-1)= log_4(3x)+ log_4(0.5).

Now use the laws of logarithms to solve for x.
 
Thank you everyone.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top