MHB How to Solve a Quartic Polynomial with x^4+1=2x(x^2+1)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
AI Thread Summary
To solve the quartic polynomial equation x^4 + 1 = 2x(x^2 + 1), the equation is first rewritten in standard form as x^4 - 2x^3 - 2x + 1 = 0. It is assumed to have two quadratic factors, leading to the equations a + b = -2 and 2 + ab = 0, which yield specific values for a and b. The polynomial can then be factored and solved using the quadratic formula, resulting in complex solutions. An alternative approach involves substituting x with tan θ, transforming the equation into a trigonometric form, which provides numerical approximations for real roots.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Solve $$x^4+1=2x(x^2+1)$$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would first write the quartic in standard form and assume it has two quadratic factors:

$$x^4-2x^3-2x+1=(x^2+ax+1)(x^2+bx+1)=x^4+(a+b)x^3+(2+ab)x^2+(a+b)x+1$$

Equating coefficients, we find:

$$a+b=-2$$

$$2+ab=0$$

We have two solutions, but they are symmetric, hence we may take:

$$a=\sqrt{3}-1,\,b=-(\sqrt{3}+1)$$

Hence:

$$x^4-2x^3-2x+1=(x^2+(\sqrt{3}-1)x+1)(x^2-(\sqrt{3}+1)x+1)=0$$

Application of the quadratic formula on the two factors gives us:

$$x=\frac{1-\sqrt{3}\pm i\sqrt{2\sqrt{3}}}{2},\,\frac{1+\sqrt{3}\pm\sqrt{2\sqrt{3}}}{2}$$
 
You could try this. But I'll admit that I've never gotten through one of those without making any mistakes. It is, in a word, "tedious."

-Dan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
topsquark said:
You could try this. But I'll admit that I've never gotten through one of those without making any mistakes. It is, in a word, "tedious."

-Dan

Hi Dan,

The link doesn't work...:o

And my solution is less clever than the approach of MarkFL. (Nerd)

First, I let $$x=\tan \theta$$ to transform the original equation and making it as $$\sin^2 2\theta+2\sin 2\theta-2=0$$.

I then use the quadratic formula to solve for $$\sin 2\theta$$ then $$\tan \theta$$ to obtain the numerical approximation of the answers where

$$x=\tan 23.5293^{\circ}=0.4354$$ and $$x=\tan 66.4707^{\circ}=2.2966$$.

Also, I was not able to find the complex roots as well!:o:o:o
 
anemone said:
Hi Dan,

The link doesn't work...:o
It should work now. Thanks for the catch.

-Dan
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top