MHB How to Solve for a Given Probability in a Standard Normal Distribution Table?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CaptainBlack
  • Start date Start date
CaptainBlack
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
Question by KS, reposted from Yahoo Questions

P(0<z<a) = 0.3554 solution
help!
i have to find a

Since z is used for the variable we may assume that this is a normal distribution question, and that Z is a RV with a standard normal distribution.

In which case we have a problem asking us to do an inverse table look-up in a table of standard normal distribution. These come in two varieties one gives exactly the probability you require the area under the curve from 0 to a, the other gives the area from -infinity to a. In the latter case for you need:

##P(0<z<a)=P(-\infty<z<a) - P(-\infty< z<0) = P(-\infty< z< a) - 1/2##.

So for this type of table we look up:

##P(-\infty< z< a)=0.8554##

The way an inverse table look up is done is to look in the body of the table for the value of the probability and the value of a is then the corresponding value you would have looked up. This is shown in the attachment:

View attachment 85

CB
 

Attachments

  • InverseTable.PNG
    InverseTable.PNG
    42.3 KB · Views: 177
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top