1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

How to solve for x in this problem

  1. Jul 29, 2010 #1
    what's the general solution for x in the following equation

    [tex] x=c-N^{-\left(\frac{1+x}{1-x}\right)}[/tex]

    i could solve using numerical methods , but i need an exact-explicit solution .
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 30, 2010 #2

    CRGreathouse

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Looks like you'll need Lambert's W, then.
     
  4. Jul 30, 2010 #3
    You could substitute the brakets with x by a new variable and then try to rearrange until you can apply
    http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LambertW-Function.html
    In the end this new function is just like numeric. But at least you have a name for it ;)
     
  5. Jul 30, 2010 #4
    thanks for the reply .. i tried this :
    substitute

    [tex]y=\frac{1+x}{1-x}[/tex]


    then

    [tex]N^{-y}=c-\frac{y-1}{y+1}[/tex]

    or

    [tex](y+1)N^{-y}=(c-1)y+(c+1)[/tex]

    but then i got a mental block ... i don't know how to transform the problem into the form :

    [tex]A(N,c)=B(x) e^{B(x)} [/tex]
     
  6. Aug 1, 2010 #5
    i managed to reduce the problem down to the form :

    [tex]z^{(z-A)}=B[/tex]

    again , i'm stuck !!
     
  7. Aug 1, 2010 #6
    Hmm, maybe it's not doable with that function alone. I only get
    [tex]
    W(x)=Ax+B
    [/tex]
    But anyway, what's the difference between numerics and knowing an expression with W? W has to be computed numerically anyway (just like sin, cos and all other functions).
     
  8. Aug 1, 2010 #7

    Mentallic

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    [tex]\pi[/tex] has to be computed numerically too but we still allow it a symbol for convenience. And I would much rather sin(2) over a numerical approximation for it, even though if anyone wanted to evaluate sin(2) they would end up with an approximation anyway.

    I also couldn't find a solution in terms of the W function. I checked with Wolfram and it too couldn't find one.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: How to solve for x in this problem
  1. How to solve 1^x (Replies: 5)

  2. Problem solving for x (Replies: 3)

  3. How to solve for x? (Replies: 5)

Loading...