How to solve log(x)+2x=2 for x?

  • B
  • Thread starter cakeroot
  • Start date
  • #1
cakeroot
Hello:
could anyone know how to solve this equation?
log(x)+2x+2=0
I found the similar problem on another thread, https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-to-solve-log-x-x-2-0-for-x.537411/
it can be solve by lambert w function,
but in this equation we can't reshape it to xe^x that I can't solve by lambert w function.

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,829
6,651
Yes you can apply the W function to this. It is perfectly possible to rewrite your equation in terms of it.

Apart from that, you will not find a closed form solution.
 
  • #3
hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
1,468
487
You can guess that x=1, but for some other numbers like log(x)+1.5x=4 you have to solve it iteratively because it's a transcendental equation. Lambert W is just a name that has been given to the results of that kind of iterations.
 
  • #4
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,829
6,651
Lambert W is just a name that has been given to the results of that kind of iterations.
Like sin and cos are also just names that we have given other transcendental functions. Just to point out that it is not something strange and magical about the W.
 
  • #5
cakeroot
Yes you can apply the W function to this. It is perfectly possible to rewrite your equation in terms of it.

Apart from that, you will not find a closed form solution.
thanks for your respond!

but I still encountered difficulties in this problem,

the following is my derivation process:

##log(x)=-2x-2##

##x = e^{-2-2x}##

##xe^{2+2x}=1##

##xe^{2x} = \frac{1}{e^2}##

how can I solve it by lambert w?

or others solutions?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
1,468
487
Like sin and cos are also just names that we have given other transcendental functions. Just to point out that it is not something strange and magical about the W.
Yes, I should probably have stressed that fact more. The W function may be said to be a bit more exotic object that sine or cosine, though, as its power series and the differential equation producing it as solution are not as simple as those of sin and cos. Also, it doesn't appear in any fundamental physical model (sin and cos are found in the energy eigenfunctions of a free particle and the trajectory of harmonic oscillator).
 
  • #7
35,127
11,363
xe^2x = 1/(e^2)

how can I solve it by lambert w?
By definition, ##W(z)e^{W(z)}=z##. Here ##z=\frac{1}{e^2}##, and your solution is W(z).

Edit: Forgot the factor 2. See two posts below.

What exactly is the initial problem statement? Title and first post have two different equations.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes cakeroot
  • #8
cakeroot
By definition, ##W(z)e^{W(z)}=z##. Here ##z=\frac{1}{e^2}##, and your solution is W(z).

What exactly is the initial problem statement? Title and first post have two different equations.
I apologize for my negligence,

the first post is right => log(x)+2x+2=0,


---------------------------------------------------
the left side of equation is ##xe^{2x}##,
and if shift to ##xe^{x}## will cause:
##xe^{x}=\frac{1}{e^{2+x}}##,
then the right side included x that I can't solve it by w function.

please correct me if I am wrong,
thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,829
6,651
##xe^{2x} = \frac{1}{e^2}##

how can I solve it by lambert w?

or others solutions?
Multiply both sides by 2 ........
 
  • Like
Likes Douglas Sunday and cakeroot
  • #10
cakeroot
By definition, ##W(z)e^{W(z)}=z##. Here ##z=\frac{1}{e^2}##, and your solution is W(z).

What exactly is the initial problem statement? Title and first post have two different equations.
Multiply both sides by 2 ........
ah, ok, I think I understand what to do now,
thanks!
 

Related Threads on How to solve log(x)+2x=2 for x?

  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
18K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
16K
Top