MHB How to Solve Simultaneous Equations with Multiplication Symbols?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a system of simultaneous equations involving multiplication symbols. Participants clarify that the dot represents multiplication and attempt to manipulate the equations to find solutions. One user derives expressions for y in terms of x and substitutes them into another equation. However, it is concluded that the system has no real solutions, raising questions about the accuracy of the problem statement. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting and solving simultaneous equations.
AstroBoy1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can someone solve this, i know its not very hard but for me it is :/
View attachment 2014
The dot . is meaned to be * (multiplication)

can someone help me :)
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 114
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
AstroBoy said:
Can someone solve this, i know its not very hard but for me it is :/
View attachment 2014
The dot . is meaned to be * (multiplication)

can someone help me :)

You want to find $ \dfrac{x}{4} + \dfrac{x}{4} = \dfrac{x}{2} $ we want half of x

$ \dfrac{x+y}{4} = 1 - \dfrac{xy}{2} $

$ \dfrac{2(2xy)}{3} - \dfrac{3x-y}{4} = 3 $

From the first equation write y with respect to x, first i would like to multiply it with 4 to eliminate the denominator

$ x+y = 4 - 2xy \Rightarrow y( 1 + 2x) = 4-x \Rightarrow y = \dfrac{4 -x }{1+2x} $
Sub it in the second and solve it for x
Tell us what you get...
I supposed that (1+2x) =/= 0
 
Hey Astroboy,

I noticed the system of equations that you cited has no solution over the real numbers. Are you sure you have copied the problem correctly?:)
 
Hello, AstroBoy!

I agree with anemone.

\begin{array}{cccc}\tfrac{1}{4}(x+y) \;=\;1 - \tfrac{1}{2}xy & [1] \\ \tfrac{2}{3}(2xy) - \tfrac{1}{4}(3x-y) \;=\;3 & [2] \end{array}

\begin{array}{cccccccc}4\times[1]& x+y \,=\,4-2xy \\ 12\times[2] & 16xy - 9x + 3y \,=\,36 \end{array}We have: .\begin{array}{cccc}x + y + 2xy &=& 4 & [3] \\ 9x - 3y - 16xy &=& \text{-}36 & [4] \end{array}
\begin{array}{cccccc}8\times[3] & 8x + 8y + 16xy &=& 32 \\ \text{Add [4]} & 9x - 3y - 16xy &=& \text{-}36 \end{array}

We have: .17x + 5y \:=\:\text{-}4 \quad\Rightarrow\quad y \:=\:\text{-}\frac{17x+4}{5}

Substitute into [3]: .x - \frac{17x+4}{5} + 2x\left(\text{-}\frac{17x+4}{5}\right) \:=\:4

Multiply by 5: .5x - 17x - 4 - 34x^2 - 8x \:=\:20

And we have: .34x^2 + 20x + 24 \:=\:0But .17x^2 + 10x + 12 \:=\:0 .has no real roots.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top