MHB How to Solve Simultaneous Equations with Multiplication Symbols?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a system of simultaneous equations involving multiplication symbols. Participants clarify that the dot represents multiplication and attempt to manipulate the equations to find solutions. One user derives expressions for y in terms of x and substitutes them into another equation. However, it is concluded that the system has no real solutions, raising questions about the accuracy of the problem statement. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting and solving simultaneous equations.
AstroBoy1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can someone solve this, i know its not very hard but for me it is :/
View attachment 2014
The dot . is meaned to be * (multiplication)

can someone help me :)
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 117
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
AstroBoy said:
Can someone solve this, i know its not very hard but for me it is :/
View attachment 2014
The dot . is meaned to be * (multiplication)

can someone help me :)

You want to find $ \dfrac{x}{4} + \dfrac{x}{4} = \dfrac{x}{2} $ we want half of x

$ \dfrac{x+y}{4} = 1 - \dfrac{xy}{2} $

$ \dfrac{2(2xy)}{3} - \dfrac{3x-y}{4} = 3 $

From the first equation write y with respect to x, first i would like to multiply it with 4 to eliminate the denominator

$ x+y = 4 - 2xy \Rightarrow y( 1 + 2x) = 4-x \Rightarrow y = \dfrac{4 -x }{1+2x} $
Sub it in the second and solve it for x
Tell us what you get...
I supposed that (1+2x) =/= 0
 
Hey Astroboy,

I noticed the system of equations that you cited has no solution over the real numbers. Are you sure you have copied the problem correctly?:)
 
Hello, AstroBoy!

I agree with anemone.

\begin{array}{cccc}\tfrac{1}{4}(x+y) \;=\;1 - \tfrac{1}{2}xy & [1] \\ \tfrac{2}{3}(2xy) - \tfrac{1}{4}(3x-y) \;=\;3 & [2] \end{array}

\begin{array}{cccccccc}4\times[1]& x+y \,=\,4-2xy \\ 12\times[2] & 16xy - 9x + 3y \,=\,36 \end{array}We have: .\begin{array}{cccc}x + y + 2xy &=& 4 & [3] \\ 9x - 3y - 16xy &=& \text{-}36 & [4] \end{array}
\begin{array}{cccccc}8\times[3] & 8x + 8y + 16xy &=& 32 \\ \text{Add [4]} & 9x - 3y - 16xy &=& \text{-}36 \end{array}

We have: .17x + 5y \:=\:\text{-}4 \quad\Rightarrow\quad y \:=\:\text{-}\frac{17x+4}{5}

Substitute into [3]: .x - \frac{17x+4}{5} + 2x\left(\text{-}\frac{17x+4}{5}\right) \:=\:4

Multiply by 5: .5x - 17x - 4 - 34x^2 - 8x \:=\:20

And we have: .34x^2 + 20x + 24 \:=\:0But .17x^2 + 10x + 12 \:=\:0 .has no real roots.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K