How to solve SUVAT problem without using relative velocity

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
rollcast
Messages
403
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the time taken for particle A to catch up with particle B.
See attachment for variables.

I worked out the answer by finding the relative velocity of A wrt B but apparently there's another method I should have/could have used to solve it?


Homework Equations



SUVAT equations of motion


The Attempt at a Solution



See attachment.

Thanks
AL
 

Attachments

  • img001.jpg
    img001.jpg
    13.9 KB · Views: 596
Physics news on Phys.org
You could write separate expressions for the positions of each particle, then equate them to find when the positions are the same.
 
So call the final displacement when they meet, x, get 2 equations and then solve them as simultaneous equations?

Is there any advantage to that approach compared to just working out the relative velocity?
 
rollcast said:
So call the final displacement when they meet, x, get 2 equations and then solve them as simultaneous equations?

Is there any advantage to that approach compared to just working out the relative velocity?

Either approach could be transformed into the other via suitable algebraic slight of hand. The separate equation approach has the advantage that it may be more straightforward when the particle motions are more complicated. For example, suppose that both particles also had separate accelerations?
 
gneill said:
Either approach could be transformed into the other via suitable algebraic slight of hand. The separate equation approach has the advantage that it may be more straightforward when the particle motions are more complicated. For example, suppose that both particles also had separate accelerations?

But the relative approach will still work with accelerations?

Do you just work out the acceleration of one relative to the other or do you have to use v=u+at for both and then then subtract the 2?
 
rollcast said:
But the relative approach will still work with accelerations?

Do you just work out the acceleration of one relative to the other or do you have to use v=u+at for both and then then subtract the 2?

It amounts to the same thing.