How to solve the instantaneous center problem for rotating tires?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yugeci
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Center Velocity
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the instantaneous center problem for rotating tires, specifically addressing the angular velocity and reference points for calculating velocities at various points on the tires. The lower tire's motion can be analyzed independently, with point P being instantaneously stationary, while points A, B, and C have defined forward velocities based on their distances from P. The upper tire's motion is influenced by the lower tire, which rotates clockwise due to the mechanic's forward movement without slipping. The concept of "no slipping" indicates that there is no relative motion between the tire and the ground at the contact point, ensuring accurate velocity calculations. Understanding these principles is crucial for determining the instantaneous centers of rotation for the tires.
yugeci
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2e401042868e57db85fa7d9b4768c7af.png


Homework Equations



v = rw

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure where to begin, honestly. For part (a), the angular velocity w will be v/r for the lower tire and upper tire both so all I need is the right values of v and r. Now for r, what is the reference point supposed to be? If I measured r from point D, rc would be r and rA would be 3r. But these are obviously wrong according to the solutions. And I know the velocity at point P will be 0 since there is no slipping, but I have no idea how to get the velocity of the other points (and what about other arbitrary points on the tires..?)

Another thing that bothers me is that according to the solution, the upper tire is going CCW. How is that possible when the velocity is going towards the right? Shouldn't the upper tire be going CW and the lower tire CCW?

Also how do we find the instantaneous center of points A, B and C? When they all are parallel and we don't know the magnitudes.

I've been struggling to solve this problem and haven't gotten anywhere in 2 hours so help would greatly be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider just the lower tire first. The presence of the upper tire does not affect the motion of the lower tire, agreed?
What is the forward velocity of the bit of tire at point P? What is the forward velocity of point A?
You can concentrate on PAB as though it is just a rod, briefly. What do the above answers tell you about the forward velocity of point B?
Which way is the tire rotating, and how fast?
When you've got all those right, we can move onto the upper tire.
 
The mechanic is walking forwards, so the lower wheel must rotate CW because there is no slipping at point P. The upper wheel progresses forwards along with the mechanic but without any slipping of contact surfaces at point B. To see which way these must turn, try this using a pair of coins or jam jar lids if you find it difficult to run as a thought experiment.

r is the distance from the periphery to the wheel's centre of rotation, meaning it's the wheel radius
 
How do you know or why do you have to consider the lower tire first? If I do that I got Va, Vb and Vc right, but I am unsure why Vd is zero.

Also what exactly does "no slipping" mean? I don't think I am understanding that clearly as well.
 
yugeci said:
How do you know or why do you have to consider the lower tire first?
The movement of the lower tire is determined by its contact with the ground and the given overall forward motion, so you can consider it independently of the upper tire. But the movement of the upper tire depends on what the lower tire is doing.
yugeci said:
I got Va, Vb and Vc right, but I am unsure why Vd is zero.
In the lower tire, P is instantaneously stationary (it is the instantaneous centre of rotation), and A is moving forward at speed v. B is twice as far from P as A is, so it moves forward at speed 2v. Likewise, C is only moving forward at speed v, so to keep BCD straight D must be moving backwards at speed v relative to C, so is instantaneously stationary. Indeed, you could place a ceiling at height 4r and the upper tire would happily roll along that.
yugeci said:
what exactly does "no slipping"
It means that the two surfaces in contact have no relative motion parallel to the contact. In consequence, the frictional force between them does no work.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K