Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around exploring potential fields and courses that could supplement a background in Physics and Electrical Engineering for remote work opportunities. Participants consider various industries and roles that may offer flexibility in work arrangements, particularly for individuals unable to commit to full-time, in-office positions.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant, Malka, seeks advice on fields that allow for remote work flexibility beyond programming, mentioning VLSI as a potential area of interest.
- Another participant suggests looking into companies that provide software for hardware support, specifically in circuit or chip design, citing examples like Cadence Spectre and Synopsys Hspice.
- A self-employed consulting engineer shares their experience working remotely on heat pump systems, emphasizing the importance of research and development alongside engineering tasks, while noting that programming is a necessary tool in their work.
- This engineer also speculates that future engineering tasks may increasingly rely on programming, suggesting a shift in how design and planning are conducted.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express interest in various fields that could accommodate remote work, but there is no consensus on specific paths or the extent to which programming will dominate future engineering roles. The discussion remains open-ended with multiple perspectives presented.
Contextual Notes
Some limitations include the lack of detailed exploration into specific courses or certifications that would enhance employability in the suggested fields. Additionally, the discussion does not resolve the extent to which programming skills are necessary across different engineering roles.