How to understand 11 dimensions

  • Thread starter Thread starter lcandela123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions
lcandela123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've read that string theory requires 11 dimensions, our 3 spatial dimensions, time, and then 7 more dimensions that only exist at sub-nuclear distances. They are described as tightly wound up dimensions, much smaller than a proton.

I don't understand this picture. Mathematically, we can pinpoint any location, no matter how small, using the same 3 Cartesian coordinates. So how does the fact that they are very small mean that they are "extra" dimensions?

I've read that space is quantized at very low distances. Are these new dimensions smaller than one quantized unit? Is that why they exist, regardless of Cartesian mathematics? The math is not relevant at such small distances in the physical world?

I'm confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're correlating their size with their higher dimensionality. The two traits aren't necessarily intrinsically bound. The fact that they are said to be very small does not mean that extra dimensions emerge due to the size. These dimensions are merely degrees of freedom in movement. The "strings" will vibrate and wind all throughout this higher dimensional space and move through all of those extra dimensions simultaneously. It is indeed a very difficult concept to visualize, I know.
 
hey thanks, that makes a lot more sense.

I notice that popular science articles often use the same phrases, sometime the same words, to describe scientific principles. Its like they are copying off each other. This one about the extra dimensions being curled up inside very small spaces is one. Your explanation was a lot clearer.

Some others:

"A black hole is an object with so much mass than nothing can escape from it, not even light..."

"The weak nuclear force is associated with certain forms of radioactive decay..."

This reminds me of a cartoon I saw once, where a man is listening to the radio and a parrot is perched nearby. The radio says "that piece was performed by The Academy of St Martin in the Field." And the parrot says, "Neville Marriner conducting. BRRRAAAKKK!"
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
Hello everyone, I am seeking to better understand the conceptual foundations and potential consequences of "Two-Time Physics" (2T-physics), as developed by Itzhak Bars and others. My interest was sparked by a recent paper that attempts to explain anomalous results in particle physics (apparent superluminal propagation of virtual photons) within the framework of 2T-physics: Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02696 Key quote from the abstract: *"...the problem... can be solved naturally...

Similar threads

Back
Top