MHB How to Use Absolute Convergence Test on This Series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Test
Click For Summary
To apply the Absolute Convergence Test to the series $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{k}{k+1}\right)^{2k}$$, one should compute the limit $$L=\lim_{k\to\infty}\left(\left(\frac{k}{k+1}\right)^{2k}\right)$$. If the limit $L$ is non-zero, the series diverges; however, if $L$ equals zero, the test is inconclusive. Additionally, discussions on finding the radius of convergence for the function $$f(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\left(2k(x-1)^k\right)$$ indicate that it can be determined by the condition $$|x-1|<1$$. The focus remains on the coefficient of the exponential term, allowing for the removal of constant factors in the analysis.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{k}{k+1}\right)^{2k}$$
$\textsf{how do you use absolute converge test on this?}$
☕
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what I would do here is compute:

$$L=\lim_{k\to\infty}\left(\left(\frac{k}{k+1}\right)^{2k}\right)$$

If $L\ne0$, then the series must diverge. Bear in mind though, that this test is inconclusive if the limit of the summand is zero.
 
$\textsf{Find the radius / interval of convergence }\\$
\begin{align}
\displaystyle f(x)&=2k(x-1)^k
\end{align}
$\textsf{thot would ask another questions here since new stuff?}$
 
karush said:
$\textsf{Find the radius / interval of convergence }\\$
\begin{align}
\displaystyle f(x)&=2k(x-1)^k
\end{align}
$\textsf{thot would ask another questions here since new stuff?}$

If we are given:

$$f(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\left(2k(x-1)^k\right)$$

Then we compute the radius of convergence as follow:

$$|x-1|<\lim_{k\to\infty}\left|\frac{2k}{2(k+1)}\right|=1$$
 
MarkFL said:
If we are given:

$$f(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\left(2k(x-1)^k\right)$$

Then we compute the radius of convergence as follow:

$$|x-1|<\lim_{k\to\infty}\left|\frac{2k}{2(k+1)}\right|=1$$

$\text{what happened to the exponent $k$ or that a concern?}$
 
We are only concerned with the coefficient of the exponential term. In fact we can even remove any constant factors in that coefficient.
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K