How to use KALMAN with accelerometer?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on using a Kalman filter to model errors in accelerometer data, with a focus on integrating acceleration measurements. The initial confusion arises from whether to double integrate the acceleration and subtract the Kalman filter output or to directly apply the filter to the stochastic model's output. It is emphasized that treating accelerometer measurements as continuous data without accounting for randomization is incorrect. The Kalman filter's purpose is to statistically weigh sensor data against known noise and bias, providing a more accurate state estimation. Ultimately, implementing the Kalman filter is deemed a more straightforward approach than integrating using stochastic calculus.
kawabonga
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hi
I found an article that shows how to use kalman filter to models error of accelerometer. they used markov process as stochastic error, then output of this model will be used as input of KALMAN filter.

Now, I don't what to do. I'm not sure, but I think that I need to double integrate the acceleration, then I subtract kalman's filter output from the integration result.

if this is right answer, I don't see the utility of the filter. why I don't double integrate the output of stochastic model ?

link to article : www.tkt.cs.tut.fi/research/nappo_files/Davidson08.pdf

thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't understand why we use stochastic model for accelerometer instead of putting its output on kalman filter ?
 
The way I understand it, modeling sensors as stochastic processes is standard since there is always some randomization in the measurement. You can't simply take your acceleration measurement and treat it as a data point from a continuous-time model and integrate it twice. It's not going to be correct. Integrating using stochastic calculus might be viable (I've never done it), but implementing a Kalman filter is probably easier.

It seems you're not sure how to use the Kalman filter. The way I understand it, the point of the Kalman filter is to use a statistical method to weigh the sensor data against how good your sensors are (measured noise/bias in a covariance matrix) and the model you're using (linear or nonlinear) to estimate what's going on (the state). You use your predictive model and your covariance matrix to come up with a "guess" or prediction of the state based on the last state estimate. Then, you get the new sensor data and fix your prediction of the state with it.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K