How to use the Double integration method for an overhanging beam?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the double integration method to analyze an overhanging beam with point loads. It highlights that the influence of point loads is incorporated through reaction forces rather than being explicitly included in the equation. The correctness of the derived equation for a section of the beam is questioned, particularly regarding the absence of the reaction term when analyzing from right to left. The conversation emphasizes that for statically determinate beams, bending moments can be determined using equilibrium equations instead of double integration. Understanding the double integration method is essential for accurately calculating deflections and slopes in structural analysis.
Guruprakash
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Forming an equation for beam with point load at the end is well known. When we take a section at distance 'x' we ought to neglect the point load or reaction at end of the beam. But how the force influence is take into account in the equation? But when we form a equation for overhanging beam with point load which is offset from the end we include all the force and reaction in the equation.
In case of overhanging beam with point load at the end. For example:
1563961349450.png
(here RA-reaction is negative)

The equation will be as follows (by double integration method):
1563961407642.png
, as we can see the equation will not have Point load (10kN) term in it.

1) How the influence of the point load is accounted in this equation? Is it accounted by the reaction forces ([R][/A], [R][/B]) as it is calculated from the point load(10kN)?

In case of overhanging beam with offset point load from the end. For example:
1563962618424.png


The equation is (for section at x=12)
1563963315076.png
.

2) Is the above equation is correct? If yes, it has all the terms of reactions and the point load and if we take a section from right to left there will be no reaction (RA) term in the equation.

Kindly explain me how double integration method equation works.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You don’t have to use double integration if you are just looking for bending moments in a statically determinate beam. The moments at any section along the beam are determined by the equilibrium equations. In particular, the sum of moments about any point on the beam must equal zero, and that includes summing moments about a load or support point.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
15K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K