How to Write ∇ × (∇ × A) in Einstein Notation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter smoking-frog
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on expressing the vector calculus operation ∇ × (∇ × A) in Einstein notation, where A represents the vector potential of the magnetic field. The solution involves using the Levi-Civita symbol ε and partial derivatives, leading to the expression εijkjlmnm An)k. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly handling free indices and applying the identity εkijεklm = δilδjm - δimδjl for simplification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus operations, specifically curl (∇ ×).
  • Familiarity with Einstein notation and index manipulation.
  • Knowledge of the Levi-Civita symbol (ε) and its properties.
  • Basic concepts of vector potentials in electromagnetism.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of the Levi-Civita symbol in tensor calculus.
  • Learn about the identities involving the Levi-Civita symbol and Kronecker delta.
  • Explore advanced vector calculus techniques, particularly in electromagnetism.
  • Review the derivation and implications of curl operations in three-dimensional space.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those studying electromagnetism and tensor calculus, will benefit from this discussion.

smoking-frog
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Write [tex]\nabla \times (\nabla \times \vec A)[/tex] in Einstein-Notation, whereas [tex]\vec A[/tex] is the vector potential of the magnetic field.



Homework Equations


[tex](\vec a \times \vec b)=\varepsilon_{ijk} a_j b_k[/tex]




The Attempt at a Solution


[tex]\nabla \times (\nabla \times \vec A)=\varepsilon_{ijk} \partial_j(\varepsilon_{lmn}\partial_m A_n)_k[/tex]

What to do with [tex](\varepsilon_{lmn}\partial_m A_n)_k[/tex] though?

Thank you for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
smoking-frog said:

Homework Equations


[tex](\vec a \times \vec b)=\varepsilon_{ijk} a_j b_k[/tex]

On the right hand side, there is summation over j and k, but i is a free index which only occurs once. What you really meant to write, then, is

[tex](\vec a \times \vec b)_i=\varepsilon_{ijk} a_j b_k[/tex]
 
In index notation it reads
εijkjklmlum)
after it you can use an identity
εkijεklmilδjmimδjl
(I hope this is not complete solution.if it is then delete this)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
967
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K