Zangwill, problem 10.19 - A Matching condition for the vector potential A

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating the jump discontinuity of the normal derivative of the Coulomb gauge vector potential A at a surface with a current density K(𝑟ₛ). The vector potential A is defined by the integral A = (μ₀/4π)∫(J(x')/|x-x'|)d³x. The magnetic field's jump in the parallel component is expressed as μ₀K(𝑟ₛ) = 𝑛̂ × (B₂ - B₁). The solution involves applying vector calculus identities, specifically the BAC-CAB rule, to manipulate the expression for the jump discontinuity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, particularly the cross product and curl operations.
  • Familiarity with the concept of vector potential in electromagnetism.
  • Knowledge of the Coulomb gauge condition in electromagnetic theory.
  • Proficiency in manipulating integral expressions involving current density.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the BAC-CAB rule for triple cross products in vector calculus.
  • Learn about the properties of the curl operation in relation to vector fields.
  • Explore the implications of the Coulomb gauge in electromagnetic theory.
  • Investigate the physical significance of jump discontinuities in vector potentials.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism and vector calculus, as well as anyone tackling advanced problems involving vector potentials and current densities.

BearShark
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the normal derivative of the coulomb gauge vector suffers a jump discontinuity at a surface endowed with a current density K(\vec r_s )

Homework Equations


The vector potential A is given by:
A=\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\int{\frac{J(x')}{|x-x'|}d^3x}

The magnetic field has a jump in the parallel component given by:
\mu_0K(\vec r_s )=\hat{n}\times(\vec{B_2}-\vec{B_1})

The Attempt at a Solution


Starting with the expression for the jump discontinuity, one can substitute the relation:
B=\nabla\times{A}
to get:
\mu_0K(\vec r_s )=\hat{n}\times(\nabla\times{A_2}-\nabla\times{A_1})

From here I hoped I can distribute the n - hat to get:

\mu_0K(\vec r_s )=\hat{n}\times{\nabla\times{A_2}}-\hat{n}\times{\nabla\times{A_1}}

However, I noticed most vector calculus identities refer to identities where the nabla is the first element, and trying to use the general identities for vectors lead me to have nablas that do not operate on anything. Am I in the right direction? I will appreciate advice on how to tackle this problem.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you are referring to the "BAC - CAB" rule for the triple cross product, namely
##\vec{A}\times(\vec{B}\times \vec {C})=\vec{B}(\vec{A}\cdot \vec {C})-\vec{C}(\vec{A}\cdot \vec {B} ) ##
Although order of operation matters on the left side, it does not on the right side. The vectors forming the dot products on the right side commute and so do the dot products themselves with the vectors that multiply them. So substitute
##\hat{n} = \vec{A}##, ##\vec{\nabla} = \vec{B}## and ##\vec{A}=\vec{C}##. Then you make a first pass and write
##\hat{n}\times(\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{A})=\vec{\nabla}(\hat{n}\cdot \vec{A})-\vec{A}(\hat{n}\cdot \vec{\nabla} ) ##
Finally you make sure the "nabla" has something to operate on and rearrange the second term on the right to get
##\hat{n}\times(\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{A})=\vec{\nabla}(\hat{n}\cdot \vec{A})-(\hat{n}\cdot \vec{\nabla} )\vec{A} ##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K