How uniform is the expansion of the universe?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the uniformity of the universe's expansion and its implications on various scales, including molecular, galactic, and cosmic levels. Participants explore the nature of expansion, the forces at play, and the validity of analogies used to describe the phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if the expansion of the universe is uniform, the space between molecules should also expand, potentially making the expansion imperceptible.
  • Others argue that the force of expansion is negligible compared to gravitational and electrostatic forces at small distances, preventing noticeable expansion within structures like molecules and galaxies.
  • A later reply suggests that gravitational binding within local groups of galaxies, such as the Milky Way and Andromeda, prevents them from moving apart despite the overall expansion of the universe.
  • One participant introduces the idea that gravity can curve and stretch space, comparing it to a balloon with adhesive tape that restricts certain areas from expanding as much as others.
  • Another participant mentions the Milne model, which posits that every object can be considered at the center of the universe, challenging the notion of a singular center of expansion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the universe's expansion at various scales, with no consensus reached regarding the effects of expansion on molecular versus cosmic scales.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of expansion and the unresolved nature of how different forces interact with the fabric of space during expansion.

Notvacka
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The universe is known to be expanding. There is no centre of expanision, since it's space itself that is expanding, rather than galaxies speeding away from us through space.

But if the expansion is uniform, wouldn't the space between molecules expand as well as the space between galaxies? If this were the case, one would think that the expansion would go unnoticed. The proportions within a picture remains the same when the picture is enlarged and in the popular balloon illustration of expansion, it's not only the distance between the marks on the surface of the balloon that increases, but the size of the marks as well.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Notvacka said:
The universe is known to be expanding. There is no centre of expanision, since it's space itself that is expanding, rather than galaxies speeding away from us through space.

But if the expansion is uniform, wouldn't the space between molecules expand as well as the space between galaxies? If this were the case, one would think that the expansion would go unnoticed. The proportions within a picture remains the same when the picture is enlarged and in the popular balloon illustration of expansion, it's not only the distance between the marks on the surface of the balloon that increases, but the size of the marks as well.

What you suggest would be true, however the force of expansion is miniscule compared even to that of gravity. So at small distances nothing is happening because the force to expand is being well over-powered by various forces. Think gravity, electro static interactions, gravity, magneticism. These forces are very strong relative to expansion, at great distances however expansion still holds on while the other forces dwindle away.
 
Notvacka said:
The universe is known to be expanding. There is no centre of expanision, since it's space itself that is expanding, rather than galaxies speeding away from us through space.

But if the expansion is uniform, wouldn't the space between molecules expand as well as the space between galaxies? If this were the case, one would think that the expansion would go unnoticed. The proportions within a picture remains the same when the picture is enlarged and in the popular balloon illustration of expansion, it's not only the distance between the marks on the surface of the balloon that increases, but the size of the marks as well.

Well the space between molecules won't expand because its hold by electrostatic energy and gravity, also for example The milky way and Andromeda won't go away from each other because we are gravitationally bound in the local group of galaxies. Thats why molecules won't expand, solar systems won't expand, galaxies and galaxy clusters! the expansion is about distant galaxies that are far enough from each other that gravity is much less strong then the dark energy! It's all relative, to us every galaxy is moving away from us except a few of them that are in our gravitation field, relative to other galaxy clusters we are moving away from them!
 
Then I guess that if gravity can curve space, it can also stretch space. In the balloon analogy, the markings would be replaced by pieces of adhesive tape. These would increase the tension in the surrounding surface, by not allowing the taped parts of the balloon to stretch as much when the balloon expands.

This means that the other forces mentioned, like electro static interactions, also deform space, at least to some extent, I suppose.
 
Notvacka said:
The universe is known to be expanding. There is no centre of expanision, since it's space itself that is expanding, rather than galaxies speeding away from us through space.
That is true but space expansion is not the only way that gives that effect. See for instance the Milne model, every object here is also in the center of the universe while it starts with a point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K