A How was this infinite sequence of numbers found? (non-commutative geometry )

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Heidi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laplace equation
Heidi
Messages
420
Reaction score
40
Hi Pfs,
I read these slides:
https://indico.math.cnrs.fr/event/782/attachments/1851/1997/Connes.pdf
It is about non commutative geometry (Alain Connes)
After Shapes II, you see a the plots of the square roots of a sequence of numbers given below:
5/4, 2, 5/2, 13/4 ....
I think that they are the solutions of laplacian equation related to the shape of the "drums" above. that is to say the frequencies one can get when hitting this drums.
How to retrieve this infinite sequence?
It is at page 50
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this article Connes gives an example of two isospectral drums (which are non connex).
One drum with a triangle and a quare and the other with a rectangle and a different triangle.
I found this
https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshe...ons/6.01:_Vibrations_of_Rectangular_Membranes
explaining how to get the possible frequencies emitted by a square or rectangular drum.
Do you know what are the frequencies ommitted by a trangular drum (half a square)?
 
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
Since the OP has found their answer, this thread can be closed now.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top