How we see things, relating to Crystal field theory.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the color perception of transition metal compounds, specifically [Cu(H2O)6]2+, and the role of electron excitation in this process. It is established that the octahedral arrangement around the central atom leads to the formation of non-degenerate 3d orbitals, with specific energy levels causing the absorption of certain wavelengths of light. When a photon corresponding to the energy difference between these orbitals is absorbed, the compound appears colored due to the transmission of other wavelengths. The energy from the excited electron is typically lost as heat through thermalization in an aqueous solution, rather than re-emitted as light.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of octahedral coordination in transition metal complexes
  • Familiarity with 3d orbital energy levels and electron excitation
  • Knowledge of photon absorption and emission processes
  • Basic principles of thermalization in aqueous solutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of Crystal Field Theory and its implications on color perception
  • Study the mechanisms of electron excitation and thermalization in transition metal complexes
  • Explore the effects of ligand field strength on the color of transition metal compounds
  • Investigate the role of solvent interactions in the behavior of excited electrons
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, researchers in inorganic chemistry, and professionals studying transition metal complexes and their optical properties.

arkyy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Sorry this is largely chemistry based, but delves into electron theory.

I'm a little confused about how the colour of transition metal compounds arises.

I understand that say for [Cu(H2O)6]2+, you have an octahedral arrangement around the central atom, and the specific positioning of these relative to the 3d orbitals causes the formation of non-degenerate orbitals, 3 at a 'lower' energy level, say xy,xz yz and 2 at a higher level, x2-y2, z2.
With a bit of research and looking around everyone seems to agree that when visible light hits one of these compounds, the photons whose energy corresponds to the energy difference between the two orbitals will be absorbed, so if the difference was equal to a 'photon of red light' red light would be absorbed, and all others transmitted, resulting in a blue colour perceived.

My question is what happens to the energy that the 'excited' electron receives is it lost as heat?
From my (limited) understanding of electrons and stuff, when you excite an electron, and it falls back down, it releases a photon of specific energy corresponding to the electron's initial energy. So why wouldn't an electron, excited by a 'photon of red light' not transmit red light as it 'falls' back down to its ground state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arkyy said:
Sorry this is largely chemistry based, but delves into electron theory.

I'm a little confused about how the colour of transition metal compounds arises.

I understand that say for [Cu(H2O)6]2+, you have an octahedral arrangement around the central atom, and the specific positioning of these relative to the 3d orbitals causes the formation of non-degenerate orbitals, 3 at a 'lower' energy level, say xy,xz yz and 2 at a higher level, x2-y2, z2.
With a bit of research and looking around everyone seems to agree that when visible light hits one of these compounds, the photons whose energy corresponds to the energy difference between the two orbitals will be absorbed, so if the difference was equal to a 'photon of red light' red light would be absorbed, and all others transmitted, resulting in a blue colour perceived.

My question is what happens to the energy that the 'excited' electron receives is it lost as heat?
From my (limited) understanding of electrons and stuff, when you excite an electron, and it falls back down, it releases a photon of specific energy corresponding to the electron's initial energy. So why wouldn't an electron, excited by a 'photon of red light' not transmit red light as it 'falls' back down to its ground state?

You reason as if you were in vapor, when this excited electron could disexcite before the next collision with another molecule. But you are in aqueous solution, where the mechanical means for disexcitation are many and quick. It is the general phenomenon of thermalisation. The recipient of the red photon does not remain isolated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
10K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K