How would one estimate the rotation period of a star from its spectrum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on estimating a star's rotation period using its spectral data, specifically observing shifts in flux due to starspots. The "bumps" in the flux profile indicate the movement of a starspot across the star's surface as it rotates. The challenge lies in correlating the observed wavelength shifts to a time scale for accurate rotational period estimation. Reference material, including a figure from Gray's work, is suggested for further understanding. The conversation emphasizes the need for a time-based analysis to derive the rotation period effectively.
SJay16
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Using the profiles in Figure 18.29, make an estimate for the rotation period of σ Gem.
Relevant Equations
N/A
Screenshot (156).png

The figure is shown; the measurements were taken on two consecutive observing nights. The Ordinate is the flux normalized to continuum and the abscissa is the wavelength scale. You can see the "bumps" indicated by the arrows referring to some Starspot as the spot moves on the profile; assuming a single time-stable position-stable spot.

The "bumps" slightly shifts, as indicated by the arrows in the top line profile compared to the bottom profile, as the spot "moves across" the surface as the star as it rotates; I'm just not sure how to get an estimate of the rotational period from this given just the wavelength for the abscissa, it would make sense if the abscissa was on a timescale.

Figure reference : Gray, D. (2005). The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres (3rd ed.), page 498. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316036570
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top