How would you do this equation on paper 1/2 x 26 x 10

  • Thread starter Thread starter jim1174
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper
AI Thread Summary
To solve the expression 1/2 x 26 x 10 on paper, first calculate half of 26, which equals 13. Then, multiply 13 by 10 to get 130. The multiplication can be performed from left to right, and the order of factors can be rearranged without changing the result. It's important to note that this is an expression rather than an equation, as it lacks an equals sign. Understanding these concepts is crucial for correctly performing calculations on paper.
jim1174
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
How would you do this equation on paper 1/2 x 26 x 10
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can you elaborate more on what you're looking for?

Do you want to solve it? Or typeset it in Latex?
 
I want to solve it. I can do it on my calculator but I want to learn how to do it on paper
 
jim1174 said:
How would you do this equation on paper 1/2 x 26 x 10
Easy enough to do in your head, so not much effort necessary to do on paper.
Half of 26, that much is 13;
13 multiply by 10, append one zero digit, making 130.

A connection or chain of just factors to make a product: multiply from left to right; also you can arrange the factors in the expression in any order.
 
jim1174 said:
How would you do this equation on paper 1/2 x 26 x 10
This is not an equation. A clue that you're dealing with an equation is the = symbol. Furthermore, you don't "solve" an expression - you can calculate it by carrying out the operations involved in the expression.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB 5.t.11 find x for the imaginary factors
Replies
2
Views
1K
B How do you multiply percents on paper
Replies
4
Views
1K
MHB Equation 2: Prove that ##x^2+2x\sqrt x+3x+2\sqrt x+1=0##
Replies
4
Views
1K
MHB 6.6.61 log(x-10)-log(x-6)=log(2)
Replies
13
Views
2K
I 10^(1/10) is VERY close to 2^(1/3)
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Why fixed point iteration of ##x^3 = 1-x^2## doesn't converge when ##x_0= 0##
Replies
16
Views
520
B How Do You Derive the Formula for sin(x-y)?
Replies
5
Views
2K
MHB How Much Would I Earn If I Worked 4 Weeks On and 4 Weeks Off?
Replies
2
Views
1K
B What went wrong with (-x)^2=x^2?
Replies
22
Views
2K
MHB Solve $(x^2-7x+11)^{x^2-13x+42}=1$ Equation
Replies
7
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top