Howard Johnson's permanent magnetic motor

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter qntmfred
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetic Motor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Howard Johnson's permanent magnetic motor, which has garnered attention due to its US patent (Patent No. 4151431). Despite the patent, the consensus among forum members is that the motor lacks scientific legitimacy and falls into the category of perpetual motion claims, which are not supported by established physics. The community emphasizes that patents do not equate to scientific validation, and any genuine breakthrough would receive widespread media coverage.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly thermodynamics.
  • Familiarity with the concept of perpetual motion and its implications.
  • Knowledge of patent processes and their significance in scientific validation.
  • Awareness of the distinction between theoretical concepts and practical applications in engineering.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of thermodynamics and the laws governing energy conservation.
  • Explore the history and implications of perpetual motion machines in scientific discourse.
  • Investigate the patent process and criteria for scientific validity in inventions.
  • Learn about alternative energy technologies and their scientific foundations.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, engineers, inventors, and anyone interested in the scientific evaluation of energy technologies and the implications of patents in the field of physics.

qntmfred
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
PF noob here so hopefully this is the right place for this post.

I recently saw this youtube of a working permanent magnetic motor


normally i'd dismiss this tinkerer science as "overt crackpottery" but the original work was granted a US patent http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=4151431" so maybe there's something to it.

my question is, is this motor legitimate and if it is, is it remarkable in any way?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Please do check the posting guidelines before posting.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=5929

You will see that we don't allow discussion of perpetual motion or free energy, nor is a patent listed as a valid scientific reference. If there was anything to the claim, it would be the lead story on the evening news.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K