I Hubble flow kinetic energy into other types of energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether kinetic energy associated with the Hubble flow can be transformed into other energy types, such as thermal or electromagnetic energy. Participants note that this question has been frequently raised and addressed in the forum, indicating a lack of new insights. The OP has previously asked similar questions, leading to frustration among other members. Ultimately, the thread was closed due to repetitive inquiries. The topic remains unresolved, with no new answers provided.
Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR Summary
can there be any situations where this kinetic energy coming from the Hubble flow can be transformed into some other type of energy (thermal, electromagnetic, electric, gravitational, mass...etc)?
Spacetime expands at an accelerated rate and the particles with movement associated to this expansion are coupled to the Hubble flow. In many papers that I've read, objects coupled to the Hubble flow are treated as if they have some velocity and kinetic energy associated with it.However, can there be any situations where this kinetic energy coming from the Hubble flow can be transformed into some other type of energy (thermal, electromagnetic, electric, gravitational, mass...etc)?
 
Space news on Phys.org
I suggest a forum search. This question has been asked/answered (no) many times here on PF.
 
phinds said:
This question has been asked/answered (no) many times here on PF.
Including several times by the OP himself.

@Suekdccia you have already asked this question multiple times and had it discussed multiple times. Enough is enough.

Thread closed.
 
  • Informative
Likes phinds
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top