Hubble's Staircase Effect: What Caused It and How Was It Fixed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shilly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hubble
AI Thread Summary
The Hubble "Staircase" effect in older images is due to the use of separate cameras for each quadrant, leading to noticeable differences in image quality and alignment. This issue was prevalent in images taken with the Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2). The problem was resolved with the introduction of the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFPC3) in 2009, which improved image consistency and quality. The upgrade eliminated the staircase effect, resulting in more uniform and higher-quality images. The transition to WFPC3 marked a significant enhancement in Hubble's imaging capabilities.
Shilly
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hubble "Staircase" effect?

Hi, I was just wondering why some of the older Hubble pictures have a staircase effect on them? Any help would be appreciated! Example below

edit: refer to examples in post #3
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org


OHHH so each quadrant is taken with a separate camera? Why is it no longer like this?

592px-Bok_globules_in_IC2944.jpg


600px-STSci-PRC01-33_omega_centauri.jpg
 


Because they changed the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_Field_and_Planetary_Camera_2" for the WFPC3 in 2009.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top