Huckel method for cyclooctatetraene (C8H8)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JorisL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying the Hückel method to cyclooctatetraene (C8H8) for quantum chemistry studies. Key findings include the calculation of molecular orbital energies using Frost-Musulin diagrams, with specific energy levels identified as E_1 = α + 2β, E_2 = E_3 = α + √2β, E_4 = E_5 = α, E_6 = E_7 = α - √2β, and E_8 = α - 2β. The molecular orbitals are expressed as linear combinations of atomic orbitals, with symmetry considerations playing a crucial role in determining their forms. The discussion also highlights the challenges faced in deriving additional orbitals and the importance of symmetry and the pairing theorem in the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hückel method for molecular orbital theory
  • Familiarity with Frost-Musulin diagrams for energy calculations
  • Knowledge of symmetry operations in quantum chemistry
  • Basic skills in linear algebra for handling molecular orbital coefficients
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of molecular orbitals using the Hückel method in cyclooctatetraene
  • Learn about symmetry operations and their applications in quantum chemistry
  • Investigate numerical methods for diagonalizing the tight binding Hamiltonian using Python or MATLAB
  • Study the implications of the pairing theorem in molecular orbital theory
USEFUL FOR

Quantum chemistry students, researchers in molecular modeling, and anyone interested in the application of the Hückel method for analyzing cyclic hydrocarbons.

JorisL
Messages
489
Reaction score
189
Hi

I'm studying for my course of quantum chemistry and I have some issues with applying the Hückel or thight binding method.

I can calculate the energies with ease using Frost-Musulin diagrams.
The problem is finding expressions for the molecular orbitals.
I can use symmetry considerations and the pairing theorem to find some of the orbitals.

This is an overview of what I got until now.

The energies are determined using a frost-musulin diagram.
They are E_1 = \alpha +2\beta\, ,E_2 = E_3 = \alpha +\sqrt{2}\beta\, ,E_4 = E_5=\alpha\, ,E_6=E_7 = \alpha -\sqrt{2}\beta\, ,E_8=\alpha -2\beta where E_1,\, E_2\, and\, E_3 correspond to bondig orbitals.
E_4\, and\, E_5 correspond with nonbonding orbitals and the other energies are anti-bonding.

The molecular orbitals (MO's) are denoted by \phi_i where the i corresponds with the energy. They consist of the atomic orbitals (AO's) denoted by \chi_i.

Because the lowest and highest energy orbitals must contain all symmetry, all Atomic orbitals should be included. The ring is perfectly symmetrical so they all have the same sign and coefficient for the lowest energy.

\phi_1 = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}\left(\chi_1 +\chi_2 +\chi_3 +\chi_4 +\chi_5 +\chi_6 +\chi_7 +\chi_8\right)

Because of the pairing theorem I know the highest energy orbital has a similar form only with alternating signs.

\phi_8 = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}\left(\chi_1 -\chi_2 +\chi_3 -\chi_4 +\chi_5 -\chi_6 +\chi_7 -\chi_8\right)

Know I will try to use some symmetry, the pairing theorem and some simple calculus to determine the other orbitals.

The image in the attachment shows how I named the atoms.

I assume for orbital \phi_2 that it has a nodal plane through atom 1 and 5. For \phi_3 I'll assume a nodal plane perpendicular to that i.e. through 3 and 7.

I know that E_{tot} = 2\cdot E_1 + 4\cdot E_2 + 2\cdot E_4 = 8\alpha +2\beta (2+2\sqrt{2})
Hence the sum \sum_{k,l}p_kl = 2+2\sqrt{2}.
Because of symmetry I state that the bond order is equal for all neighbours i.e. p_{12} = \frac{2+2\sqrt{2}}{8} = \frac{1+\sqrt{2}}{4}

But I can't get any further with this.
I can use normality of the orbital to say that
1 = \int dV \phi^*_2\phi_2 = c_1^2+c_2^2+c_3^2+c_4^2+c_5^2+c_6^2+c_7^2+c_8^2

Furthermore c_1 = c_5 = 0 because of the nodal plane.
Also c_2=c_4=-c_6=-c_8 and c_3=-c_7 from symmetry.

When I use this information about the coefficients and the bond order between 1 and 2, I find found that c_4 = 0 and consequently that c_3 = \infty

I have no idea what else I can use because when I want to use the fact that the electron density is uniform as well, I need to include the 2 non-bonding orbitals as well.

Am I looking in the right direction? Or should I start over in another way?

Joris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This may be a stupid question, but can't you just write down the whole tight binding Hamiltonian as a N x N matrix and then diagonalize it? Using Python/scipy or Matlab or your favorite numerical scripting language this could probably be done in about 20 lines of code.
 
Of course I can do that. But the exercise is made in such a way that we have to use symmetry etc. And I can use the practice. I don't always find the correct symmetry element/operation I have to use.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
27K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K