MHB HUGGIE BUGGIE's question at Yahoo Answers regarding calculating a sum

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the total earnings over 16 years with a starting salary of $50,000 and a 4% annual increase, the salary for each year can be expressed using the formula S_k=50000(26/25)^(k-1). The total earnings T_n for n years can be derived from the sum formula, leading to T_n=50000[(26/25)^n - 1] / (1/25). After applying this for 16 years, the approximate total earnings amount to $1,091,227 when rounded to the nearest dollar. This calculation provides a clear method for determining cumulative salary growth over time.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Math Homework HELP! PLEASE!?


If your starting salary were $50,000 and you received a 4% increase at the end of every year for 15 years, what would be the total amount, in dollars, you would have earned over the first 16 years that you worked?

I have no idea how to get the answer to this please help me!

I have to round my answer to the nearest dollar

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello HUGGIE BUGGIE!,

Your salary $S$ for the $k$th year in dollars is:

$$S_k=50000\left(\frac{26}{25} \right)^{k-1}$$

And hence, the sum total $T$ of the money earned during the first $n$ years is:

$$T_n=50000\sum_{k=1}^{n}\left(\frac{26}{25} \right)^{k-1}=50000\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\left(\frac{26}{25} \right)^{k}$$

Using the formula:

$$\sum_{k=0}^{n}r^k=\frac{r^{n+1}-1}{r-1}$$

we may write:

$$T_n=50000\left(\frac{\left(\dfrac{26}{25} \right)^n-1}{\frac{26}{25}-1} \right)=1250000\left(\left(\frac{26}{25} \right)^n-1 \right)$$

Thus, the money earned during the first 16 years is:

$$T_{16}=1250000\left(\left(\frac{26}{25} \right)^{16}-1 \right)=\frac{325210856544670578706416}{298023223876953125}\approx1091227$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top