MHB HUGGIE BUGGIE's question at Yahoo Answers regarding calculating a sum

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the total earnings over 16 years with a starting salary of $50,000 and a 4% annual increase, the salary for each year can be expressed using the formula S_k=50000(26/25)^(k-1). The total earnings T_n for n years can be derived from the sum formula, leading to T_n=50000[(26/25)^n - 1] / (1/25). After applying this for 16 years, the approximate total earnings amount to $1,091,227 when rounded to the nearest dollar. This calculation provides a clear method for determining cumulative salary growth over time.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Math Homework HELP! PLEASE!?


If your starting salary were $50,000 and you received a 4% increase at the end of every year for 15 years, what would be the total amount, in dollars, you would have earned over the first 16 years that you worked?

I have no idea how to get the answer to this please help me!

I have to round my answer to the nearest dollar

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello HUGGIE BUGGIE!,

Your salary $S$ for the $k$th year in dollars is:

$$S_k=50000\left(\frac{26}{25} \right)^{k-1}$$

And hence, the sum total $T$ of the money earned during the first $n$ years is:

$$T_n=50000\sum_{k=1}^{n}\left(\frac{26}{25} \right)^{k-1}=50000\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\left(\frac{26}{25} \right)^{k}$$

Using the formula:

$$\sum_{k=0}^{n}r^k=\frac{r^{n+1}-1}{r-1}$$

we may write:

$$T_n=50000\left(\frac{\left(\dfrac{26}{25} \right)^n-1}{\frac{26}{25}-1} \right)=1250000\left(\left(\frac{26}{25} \right)^n-1 \right)$$

Thus, the money earned during the first 16 years is:

$$T_{16}=1250000\left(\left(\frac{26}{25} \right)^{16}-1 \right)=\frac{325210856544670578706416}{298023223876953125}\approx1091227$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top