For a little I have been wondering about whether it is better for humanity to embrace human enchancement technologies. I can't come to any conclusion, because there seem to be valid arguments on both sides. Valid For: quality of life can improve because people see the world a little more correctly and with less social bias in their thinking..far as I can tell. Valid Against: Rich can afford it and division between rich and poor becomes larger... Looking at resources on the internet on the topic, this appears to be a fairly complex issue and people who can attempt answers that hold ground appear to be philosophers. So I thought this was a good place to start a discussion on the topic. Care to share your musings?