Human marathon limit challenged by Nike

  • Thread starter Thread starter houlahound
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on Nike's initiative to challenge the two-hour marathon barrier, highlighting the ongoing debate about the natural limits of human performance. Mathematical modeling suggests that the fastest possible marathon time is slightly above two hours, with splits of 4:34 per mile. Historical data shows significant improvements in marathon records, with the current record standing at 2:02:57, achieved by multiple athletes since 2008. The conversation emphasizes that while records are being shattered, the idea of a definitive limit remains unproven.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of marathon running dynamics
  • Familiarity with mathematical modeling in sports science
  • Knowledge of historical marathon records and their progression
  • Awareness of training methodologies for elite athletes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Nike's Breaking2 project and its methodologies
  • Explore advanced training techniques used by elite marathoners
  • Study the impact of physiological factors on marathon performance
  • Investigate mathematical models predicting athletic performance limits
USEFUL FOR

Endurance athletes, sports scientists, coaches, and anyone interested in the evolution of marathon running and performance optimization.

That's 4:34 splits. I could barely run one mile at that pace in college. I was happy to get under three and a half hours and I felt like I was flying.
 
Ygggdrasil said:
Here's a neat post from a physics blog from a while ago using some mathematical modeling to predict that the fastest possible marathon time is just above 2 hrs: https://gravityandlevity.wordpress.com/2011/04/11/the-fastest-possible-marathon/
An exponential fit starting at 2h+1h, used to predict something with a single-minute accuracy? That cannot work. See how the 2014 record ruined the whole analysis. I guess Bolt's 100 m record(s) ruined some similar trend lines - he ran 1% faster than anyone else.
 
I don't like trendline with running events either. Often records stand for a long time then get shattered and then the old record is trampled on by everyone else. That's usually due to a breakthrough new training method.
 
I think the idea is racing is invalid for actual record attempts, too many things on race day that makes data incomparable.
 
One more comment on the last years: the blog article Ygggdrasil linked was from April 2011. At that time, the record was 2:03:59, set in 2008. It was improved to 2:03:38 in September 2011, 2:03:23 in 2013, and finally 2:02:57 in 2014 - always at the Berlin marathon, but from 3 different runners. 6 years after the article was written, the record improved by 1 minute and 2 seconds, and 7 athletes achieved times better than the 2008 record.

Just based on the running times, there is no hard limit visible yet. In the last years not only the world record improved by 1 minute, the times of others improved by the same amount.
 
Olympic marathoners are just incredible. I remember watching the last few miles of the front runners and thinking my god they are running faster in these last miles than I can sprint.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
661
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
921
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K