KiltedEngineer
- 17
- 0
- TL;DR
- Hydraulic cylinder encountered in a system is held in place with a pin that catastrophically fails once its shear force is reached, at which point the cylinder actuates. What benefit does this add to the application described below.
I have encountered a vertically oriented hydraulic cylinder that is designed to actuate and slice heavy cabling into sections with a blade. The cylinder is quite small (around 1.5 inches in diameter) and has an equally small stroke. The cylinder is single acting (i.e. it is pressurized from the bottom, and vented to atmosphere with a spring return, roughly 200lbs of force on the spring). The system operates at roughly 2500 psi.
Interestingly, the cylinder has a pin that passes through its piston Rod, as well as the housing mounted around it, that prevents the cylinder from moving initially. When the control valve is actuated, fluid is ported to the bottom of the cylinder, pressure builds extremely quickly (as expected) and the pin shears, allowing the cylinder to actuate.
Long story short, we are looking into redesigning this machine, and nobody can seem to determine what the purpose of this pin is (the old designers with the knowledge are no longer with us). From a hydraulics standpoint, at full flow the cylinder should move instaneously and at the speed dictated by the flow, regardless of whether or not the pin is in or not, so I don’t see the benefit of building pressure behind the pin to meet the shear pin force and then allowing it to fire the cylinder. Is there an advantage gained in potential “impulse” by doing this? Any theory I can think of says no (hydraulics don’t expand like gases), but then again I’ve seen hydraulic presses accelerate after being at stall briefly once they destroy whatever is under them.
I suppose along those lines I’ll ask the theoretical question: What would the outcome be if you theoretically held back a cylinder maintained at a set pressure with a load, and then suddenly (almost instantly) removed the load allowing the cylinder to extend? Would it jump forward faster or show jerky motion?
The cylinder does contain cast iron rings and wave washers, presumably because of the shock of the cylinder slamming in the extended position.
Asking more so out of curiosity why such an arrangement would exist.
Thank you.
Interestingly, the cylinder has a pin that passes through its piston Rod, as well as the housing mounted around it, that prevents the cylinder from moving initially. When the control valve is actuated, fluid is ported to the bottom of the cylinder, pressure builds extremely quickly (as expected) and the pin shears, allowing the cylinder to actuate.
Long story short, we are looking into redesigning this machine, and nobody can seem to determine what the purpose of this pin is (the old designers with the knowledge are no longer with us). From a hydraulics standpoint, at full flow the cylinder should move instaneously and at the speed dictated by the flow, regardless of whether or not the pin is in or not, so I don’t see the benefit of building pressure behind the pin to meet the shear pin force and then allowing it to fire the cylinder. Is there an advantage gained in potential “impulse” by doing this? Any theory I can think of says no (hydraulics don’t expand like gases), but then again I’ve seen hydraulic presses accelerate after being at stall briefly once they destroy whatever is under them.
I suppose along those lines I’ll ask the theoretical question: What would the outcome be if you theoretically held back a cylinder maintained at a set pressure with a load, and then suddenly (almost instantly) removed the load allowing the cylinder to extend? Would it jump forward faster or show jerky motion?
The cylinder does contain cast iron rings and wave washers, presumably because of the shock of the cylinder slamming in the extended position.
Asking more so out of curiosity why such an arrangement would exist.
Thank you.