MHB Hypothesis Testing: Wrong Critical Z Score Explained

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on hypothesis testing, specifically addressing critical z-values for left-sided and two-sided hypotheses. For a left-sided hypothesis in question (2), the critical z-value is typically -1.645, and the test statistic must be more negative than this value to reject the null hypothesis. In question (3), which involves a two-sided hypothesis, the correct critical z-values are ±2.5758, corresponding to an alpha of 0.01 divided by 2. The confusion arose from using incorrect critical values of ±2.33, which are not applicable for the specified alpha level. Clarifications on the critical values resolved the issues presented in the questions.
yelenaaa13
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Screen Shot 2021-11-13 at 3.25.12 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks as if question (2) asks about a left sided hypothesis.
The critical z-value should then typically be $-1.645$.

Where did you get the test statistic z?
To reject the null hypothesis, we need that the test statistic z is more negative than $-1.645$.

In question (3) we have a 2-sided hypothesis.
It means that we need to find the critical z-value for $\frac \alpha 2=0.005$, which is $\pm 2.5758$.
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
It looks as if question (2) asks about a left sided hypothesis.
The critical z-value should then typically be $-1.645$.

Where did you get the test statistic z?
To reject the null hypothesis, we need that the test statistic z is more negative than $-1.645$.

What is your problem with question (3)?

Thank you for your response!

I got the test statistic from this formula: ((p-hat - p)/(square root((p(1-p))/n) ( i attached an image of the formula i used since this is kind of hard to read).
It was cut off, but p-hat and n were given. p-hat is 0.75 and n = 90.

And my problem with question 3 is the z critical values. It says 2.33 and -2.33 are wrong, but on the table those are the values that correspond with an alpha of 0.01
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6344.jpeg
    IMG_6344.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 137
yelenaaa13 said:
And my problem with question 3 is the z critical values. It says 2.33 and -2.33 are wrong, but on the table those are the values that correspond with an alpha of 0.01

Question 3 has a 2-sided hypothesis. We need the values that correspond to alpha/2=0.005.

Question 2 has a left-sided hypothesis. You probably need a minus sign in front of the critical z-value.
 
Last edited:
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Question 3 has a 2-sided hypothesis. We need the values that correspond to alpha/2=0..005.

Question 2 has a left-sided hypothesis. You probably need a minus sign in front of the critical z-value.
Okay that's exactly what was wrong. Thank you so much for your help!
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...

Similar threads