MHB Hypothesis Testing: Wrong Critical Z Score Explained

yelenaaa13
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Screen Shot 2021-11-13 at 3.25.12 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks as if question (2) asks about a left sided hypothesis.
The critical z-value should then typically be $-1.645$.

Where did you get the test statistic z?
To reject the null hypothesis, we need that the test statistic z is more negative than $-1.645$.

In question (3) we have a 2-sided hypothesis.
It means that we need to find the critical z-value for $\frac \alpha 2=0.005$, which is $\pm 2.5758$.
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
It looks as if question (2) asks about a left sided hypothesis.
The critical z-value should then typically be $-1.645$.

Where did you get the test statistic z?
To reject the null hypothesis, we need that the test statistic z is more negative than $-1.645$.

What is your problem with question (3)?

Thank you for your response!

I got the test statistic from this formula: ((p-hat - p)/(square root((p(1-p))/n) ( i attached an image of the formula i used since this is kind of hard to read).
It was cut off, but p-hat and n were given. p-hat is 0.75 and n = 90.

And my problem with question 3 is the z critical values. It says 2.33 and -2.33 are wrong, but on the table those are the values that correspond with an alpha of 0.01
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6344.jpeg
    IMG_6344.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 130
yelenaaa13 said:
And my problem with question 3 is the z critical values. It says 2.33 and -2.33 are wrong, but on the table those are the values that correspond with an alpha of 0.01

Question 3 has a 2-sided hypothesis. We need the values that correspond to alpha/2=0.005.

Question 2 has a left-sided hypothesis. You probably need a minus sign in front of the critical z-value.
 
Last edited:
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Question 3 has a 2-sided hypothesis. We need the values that correspond to alpha/2=0..005.

Question 2 has a left-sided hypothesis. You probably need a minus sign in front of the critical z-value.
Okay that's exactly what was wrong. Thank you so much for your help!
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top