I am here but i am also over there, can this be?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Andy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the feasibility of a particle existing in two locations simultaneously and the implications for time travel, referencing concepts from Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. Participants assert that while Special Relativity indicates that simultaneity is relative, Quantum Mechanics introduces the idea of wave-particles, complicating the notion of individual particle observation. The discussion also touches on ongoing research at the University of Colorado regarding wave function collapse, although consensus remains that time travel, particularly to the past, is fundamentally prohibited by current physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Special Relativity and its implications on simultaneity
  • Familiarity with Quantum Mechanics, particularly wave-particle duality
  • Knowledge of wave function collapse in quantum systems
  • Basic principles of time measurement and its philosophical implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Special Relativity on simultaneity and observation
  • Explore Quantum Mechanics concepts, focusing on wave-particle duality and wave function collapse
  • Investigate current experiments related to quantum states and particle observation at the University of Colorado
  • Examine philosophical discussions surrounding the nature of time and its measurement
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the complexities of time travel and quantum mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
Matter is energy. Glad I could answer that.

Time...that one indeed we cannot answer.

The equations of GR are not too difficult, just not easy.

As for your paradox, we cannot answer, hence why it is a paradox.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Originally posted by Andy
So its just aload of rubbish that people like to think makes sense even though it doesnt, just theories based upon other theories that we don't understand either.

I think some people may be confusing truth or essence with physical models. We have models that work. We have models that predict that time travel would occur given certain circumstances. I don't think any of modern physics is rubbish. In modern QM we have a model that work better than the sum of all that has come before. Do we have the right answers? I think no; but we don't know. That is your answer Andy; if anyone claims to know otherwise then they dismiss some of the greatest minds in science. The issue of time travel is one of controversy and is unresolved. We have found no absolute reason why we cannot travel forwards or backwards in time. We can only cite the many paradoxes and conundrums that seem to be implicit, and then continue to look for proof one way or the other. No one has ever suggested [to my knowledge] a time machine that could as yet actually be built. It could forever be a practical problem of having sufficient energy that makes time travel impossible.
 
  • #33
Personally, I think asking questions pertaining to 'what is time' and 'what is matter' are particularly prevelant to Physics. If we did not ask such questions, would we have ever discovered the quark? Now, who's to say if we'll ever find out what the answers to these questions are, but we have to keep asking, if for no other reason than the sake of asking tough questions.
 

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
863
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
746
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
873
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
695
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K