I am not a teacher or even student of physics but I am translating a

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on translating a physics paper and the appropriate terminology to use regarding "m-dependency." Participants suggest that "dependence on m" is clearer and more conventional than "m-dependency," which requires definition if introduced as a new term. The original sentence is recommended to be split for clarity. The consensus is to use "dependence on m" for accuracy and understanding. Clear communication in scientific translation is emphasized.
Turrialba
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am not a teacher or even student of physics but I am translating a physics paper into English and I need some help. I have a sentence that may translate as follows:

"Newton introduced m-dependency upon taking into consideration, within the context of his second law, the experimental fact that all objects close to the Earth’s surface fall with the same gravitational acceleration."

Does the term "m-dependency" make sense in this context? The literal translation would be "dependence with m" and in previous sentences there is a definition of m as the mass of a planet.

Should I use "m-dependency" or "dependence on/with m"?

Thank you in advance for your patience and understanding.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What does m-dependency mean? Dependence on some mass m?
I would try to split that sentence into two smaller ones.
 


@mfb, the OP said the paper defined m as the mass of the planet.

I would translate it as "dependence on m". If you want to use a new techincal term like "m-dependency", you need to define what it means.
 


Thank you. I will use dependence on m.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top