I bet 95% of you will miss this

  • Thread starter Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a video related to inattentional blindness, where participants are asked to count basketball passes while missing other surprising elements in the video. The conversation touches on cognitive psychology, attention mechanisms, and personal experiences with the video.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express that they missed the surprise element in the video, while others claim they did not, often attributing their experience to attention span or prior knowledge of the video.
  • A participant with a background in cognitive psychology discusses experiments on inattentional blindness, mentioning that a significant percentage of men fail to notice a brunette in the video.
  • There is a suggestion that the experimental setup could be improved to test attention differently, such as introducing a more visually distracting element.
  • Several participants reference the historical context of the experiment, noting its repetition in various forms, including the famous gorilla suit experiment.
  • Discussions arise about the perceptions of physical attributes of individuals in the video, with some participants sharing personal preferences and humorous takes on the subject.
  • One participant raises the question of how many details are missed when focusing on a specific task, emphasizing the nature of selective attention.
  • Another participant mentions that the original concept of this experiment is quite old, linking it to previous studies and suggesting that the phenomenon of inattentional blindness has been well-documented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the effectiveness of the video or the statistics mentioned regarding inattentional blindness. Multiple competing views remain regarding personal experiences with the video and interpretations of the experiment's implications.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific studies and experiments related to inattentional blindness, but there is no agreement on the validity of the statistics or the interpretations of the findings. The discussion includes personal anecdotes that may not be representative of broader trends.

  • #31
Kurdt said:
Looks like a BMW 5 series with an E28 body style in production from 1982 - 1988. If I had to guess I'd say it was a 528.

Did anybody even ask about the car?

She does have nice legs, though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Math Is Hard said:
This experiment has been done over and over and over and over..
sometimes it's a person in a gorilla suit. sometimes it's a person with an umbrella. The "count the basketball passes" experimental paradigm is pretty standard.

Would be kind of interesting to try it with a sexy girl/guy walking through the scene and see if it makes any difference.

Here is a video on the attention system and things we miss:


and I could care less about brunettes or blondes. It was a joke.


Looking at the report mattmns linked to, it looks like a person would see a woman with an umbrella easier than a gorilla. And it's easier to see the gorilla if you're counting passes of the black team. That seems counter-intuitive. You'd think the more bizarre the interruption, the more noticeable it would be. Instead, the easier it is to discard the interruption as irrelevant to your task, the less noticeable the interruption is. It looks like it works as an attention filter.

So why do drivers have such a hard time seeing motorcycles and bicycles? Because they've mentally conditioned themselves to look for cars. Motorcycles, bicycles, and pedestrians are filtered out of drivers' attention.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #33
BobG said:
Looking at the report mattmns linked to, it looks like a person would see a woman with an umbrella easier than a gorilla. And it's easier to see the gorilla if you're counting passes of the black team. That seems counter-intuitive. You'd think the more bizarre the interruption, the more noticeable it would be. Instead, the easier it is to discard the interruption as irrelevant to your task, the less noticeable the interruption is. It looks like it works as an attention filter.

So why do drivers have such a hard time seeing motorcycles and bicycles? Because they've mentally conditioned themselves to look for cars. Motorcycles, bicycles, and pedestrians are filtered out of drivers' attention.

Using that same logic, I think that's why I usually don't see too many intelligent women.


(actually, I think its because all the good ones aren't available for too long, or they're intelligent enough to stay out of the bar scene.:wink:)
 
  • #34
B. Elliott said:
Nevermind.

This always makes me laugh, did Nirvana's second album really have so much influence as to get most people to spell never mind like this?
 
  • #35
rewebster said:
too large breasts
You know just stringing words together doesn't automatically mean they make sense.

Look:
gigantic dwarf
the sound of blue
too much chocolate
 
  • #36
mattmns said:
edit... looks like a Harvard professor performed this experiment in 1999: http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~cfc/Simons1999.pdf#search=%22Simons%20and%20Chabris%20on%20sustained%20inattentional%20blindness%22

edit2... wasn't the "original" video posted here a couple years ago? I could have sworn I seen it somewhere.

Yeah. It's gone now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #37
rewebster said:
Using that same logic, I think that's why I usually don't see too many intelligent women.


(actually, I think its because all the good ones aren't available for too long, or they're intelligent enough to stay out of the bar scene.:wink:)

Or because they see you first?
 
  • #38
BobG said:
Or because they see you first?

maybe that's why I see a lot of the backs of women's heads
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
624
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
14K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K