I bet 95% of you will miss this

  • Thread starter Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around a well-known experiment related to inattentional blindness, where viewers are asked to count basketball passes while missing a surprising element in the video, such as a person in a gorilla suit. Participants share their experiences with the video, noting that many people fail to see the unexpected elements due to their focus on counting. The conversation touches on cognitive psychology principles, mentioning how distractions can filter out significant details. There are humorous exchanges about preferences for hair color and physical attributes, but the main focus remains on how attention works and the implications for perception in everyday situations, like driving. The thread also references previous iterations of the experiment and its historical context, highlighting its timeless nature in psychology discussions.
  • #31
Kurdt said:
Looks like a BMW 5 series with an E28 body style in production from 1982 - 1988. If I had to guess I'd say it was a 528.

Did anybody even ask about the car?

She does have nice legs, though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Math Is Hard said:
This experiment has been done over and over and over and over..
sometimes it's a person in a gorilla suit. sometimes it's a person with an umbrella. The "count the basketball passes" experimental paradigm is pretty standard.

Would be kind of interesting to try it with a sexy girl/guy walking through the scene and see if it makes any difference.

Here is a video on the attention system and things we miss:


and I could care less about brunettes or blondes. It was a joke.


Looking at the report mattmns linked to, it looks like a person would see a woman with an umbrella easier than a gorilla. And it's easier to see the gorilla if you're counting passes of the black team. That seems counter-intuitive. You'd think the more bizarre the interruption, the more noticeable it would be. Instead, the easier it is to discard the interruption as irrelevant to your task, the less noticeable the interruption is. It looks like it works as an attention filter.

So why do drivers have such a hard time seeing motorcycles and bicycles? Because they've mentally conditioned themselves to look for cars. Motorcycles, bicycles, and pedestrians are filtered out of drivers' attention.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #33
BobG said:
Looking at the report mattmns linked to, it looks like a person would see a woman with an umbrella easier than a gorilla. And it's easier to see the gorilla if you're counting passes of the black team. That seems counter-intuitive. You'd think the more bizarre the interruption, the more noticeable it would be. Instead, the easier it is to discard the interruption as irrelevant to your task, the less noticeable the interruption is. It looks like it works as an attention filter.

So why do drivers have such a hard time seeing motorcycles and bicycles? Because they've mentally conditioned themselves to look for cars. Motorcycles, bicycles, and pedestrians are filtered out of drivers' attention.

Using that same logic, I think that's why I usually don't see too many intelligent women.


(actually, I think its because all the good ones aren't available for too long, or they're intelligent enough to stay out of the bar scene.:wink:)
 
  • #34
B. Elliott said:
Nevermind.

This always makes me laugh, did Nirvana's second album really have so much influence as to get most people to spell never mind like this?
 
  • #35
rewebster said:
too large breasts
You know just stringing words together doesn't automatically mean they make sense.

Look:
gigantic dwarf
the sound of blue
too much chocolate
 
  • #36
mattmns said:
edit... looks like a Harvard professor performed this experiment in 1999: http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~cfc/Simons1999.pdf#search=%22Simons%20and%20Chabris%20on%20sustained%20inattentional%20blindness%22

edit2... wasn't the "original" video posted here a couple years ago? I could have sworn I seen it somewhere.

Yeah. It's gone now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #37
rewebster said:
Using that same logic, I think that's why I usually don't see too many intelligent women.


(actually, I think its because all the good ones aren't available for too long, or they're intelligent enough to stay out of the bar scene.:wink:)

Or because they see you first?
 
  • #38
BobG said:
Or because they see you first?

maybe that's why I see a lot of the backs of women's heads
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
11K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K