I don't get a step with this quadratic question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nathi ORea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic question
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the factorization of the number 28 in the context of the quadratic formula. Participants explain that it is a convention to simplify square roots by factoring out perfect squares, such as recognizing that √28 can be expressed as 2√7. There is an emphasis on the importance of writing mathematical expressions correctly, with suggestions to use LaTeX for clarity. Some members note that while simplifying square roots is a standard practice, modern calculators can provide decimal results more easily. Overall, the conversation highlights both the conventions in mathematics and the evolution of calculation methods.
Nathi ORea
Messages
82
Reaction score
22
Homework Statement
I did the example, and actually got the same answer (0.215), but am a little confused how they did it.

So I did ; 16 - 4 x 5 x -1 = 28.

Then they factorise it into 4 x 7 for some reason.... then I have no idea what wizardry they perform on the next line.
Relevant Equations
Appreciate any help.
IMG_6643.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yup. So I used b2 - 4ac to find 28. All good. but I am not sure why they factorised 28?
 
Nathi ORea said:
Yup. So I used b2 - 4ac to find 28. All good. but I am not sure why they factorised 28?
Because they know they are about to take the square root and will want to bring the two outside of it. They are being overly descriptive.
 
What rule says you can bring the 2 outside of it?
 
##\sqrt{ab}=\sqrt{a} \sqrt{b}##
 
  • Like
Likes Nathi ORea and pinball1970
Oh. I see. I haven't got to that section yet. Thank you!
 
Nathi ORea said:
Oh. I see. I haven't got to that section yet. Thank you!
They are probably assuming that you already know this (i.e., there is not a section coming) so you will probably want to review this on your own.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave, MatinSAR and Nathi ORea
Nathi ORea said:
So I did ; 16 - 4 x 5 x -1 = 28.
Typo in your work. The above should be ##16 - 4(3)(-1) = 28##.
Nathi ORea said:
So I used b2 - 4ac to find 28.
You've been a member here for almost three years. Please take the time to learn at least the rudiments of how to write mathematical expressions. At the very least, b^2 - 4ac. Better yet, using LaTeX to write ##b^2 - 4ac##. When you're creating a post, there's a link to our LaTeX tutorial in the lower left corner.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR, Nathi ORea and WWGD
  • #10
As Mark suggested, just wrap the expression b^2-4ac with ## tags for a start.
 
  • #11
Nathi ORea said:
Oh. I see. I haven't got to that section yet. Thank you!
It's a convention to take any square factors out of a square root. For example, if you ended up with ##\sqrt 4##, that wouldn't be wrong in itself. But, the convention is to write that as ##\sqrt 4 = 2##.

And, if you have ##\sqrt{28}##, then again you are expected to look for square factors. In this case, ##28## has a factor of ##4##. So, you are expected to write ##\sqrt{28} = 2\sqrt 7##.

Note that some mathematicians take this sort of thing very seriously indeed and that leaving something as ##\sqrt{28}## ought to be punishable by a jail term. I don't see that it matters much, but perhaps that's why I'm not a mathematician.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR, Steve4Physics, SammyS and 2 others
  • #12
PeroK said:
It's a convention to take any square factors out of a square root. For example, if you ended up with ##\sqrt 4##, that wouldn't be wrong in itself. But, the convention is to write that as ##\sqrt 4 = 2##.

And, if you have ##\sqrt{28}##, then again you are expected to look for square factors. In this case, ##28## has a factor of ##4##. So, you are expected to write ##\sqrt{28} = 2\sqrt 7##.

Note that some mathematicians take this sort of thing very seriously indeed and that leaving something as ##\sqrt{28}## ought to be punishable by a jail term. I don't see that it matters much, but perhaps that's why I'm not a mathematician.
Ahhhh.. so that’s why they did it! Thank you very much 🙏
 
  • #13
PeroK said:
It's a convention to take any square factors out of a square root. For example, if you ended up with ##\sqrt 4##, that wouldn't be wrong in itself. But, the convention is to write that as ##\sqrt 4 = 2##.

And, if you have ##\sqrt{28}##, then again you are expected to look for square factors. In this case, ##28## has a factor of ##4##. So, you are expected to write ##\sqrt{28} = 2\sqrt 7##.

Note that some mathematicians take this sort of thing very seriously indeed and that leaving something as ##\sqrt{28}## ought to be punishable by a jail term. I don't see that it matters much, but perhaps that's why I'm not a mathematician.
If one is looking for a numeric result, ie, a decimal answer (such as the 0.215 quoted in the OP), today you simply punch "SQRT 28" into your hand calculator and move on. That's actually fewer keys pressed than "2 times SQRT 7". In the old days, I think algebra lessons stopped at ##2\sqrt 7##. Maybe because evaluating ##\sqrt 7## was an exercise in table lookups, or log tables, or slide rules; and these were topics/skills mastered prior to algebra.
 
Back
Top