I seek an equation for water/oxygen in an airmass

  • Thread starter Thread starter TedNugget
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on deriving an equation to calculate the ratio of water molecules to oxygen molecules in a mass of air, based on parameters such as density, temperature, and relative humidity. The focus includes theoretical aspects and practical applications, particularly in relation to wildland fire behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks an equation for the ratio of water to oxygen molecules in air, considering factors like density, temperature, and relative humidity.
  • Another participant notes that the components of air move together, suggesting that the oxygen content in dry air is approximately 20.95% and that water vapor's effect on oxygen concentration can be modeled.
  • It is mentioned that the amount of water vapor is determined by saturation vapor pressure and relative humidity, with caution expressed regarding the accuracy of algebraic expressions for saturation vapor pressure.
  • Participants discuss the displacement of oxygen by water vapor and how this may vary in different environments, such as rural versus urban air.
  • One participant provides specific equations for calculating the partial pressures of water vapor and oxygen, along with a warning about the importance of accurate pressure measurements.
  • Another participant shares calculations based on specific conditions, including temperature and relative humidity, and discusses the implications of their results.
  • There is a correction regarding the interpretation of the ratio of water to oxygen molecules, clarifying the correct phrasing of the ratio.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the calculations and the underlying assumptions, with no clear consensus reached on the best approach or the accuracy of the proposed equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential limitations in the accuracy of saturation vapor pressure equations and the need for precise local pressure measurements to ensure valid calculations.

TedNugget
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I seek an equation to determine the ratio of water molecules / O2 molecules in a mass of air ------- given density, temperature and relative humidity. (Moles H2O / Moles O2)

The volume can be any size, a cubic meter is fine. I’m just interested in the ratio.
Density can be expressed in any measure.

I would prefer temperature in F but C is fine.

Because water displaces other elements in an airmass I believe this could be complicated. Depending on how much Oxygen is displaced or how predictable its displacement is.

I seek to do this over a range of densities that match those from the psychrometric tables for %RH calculation.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Trivia:
I need some accuracy to then see if this has any correlation with wildland fire behavior.
Perhaps paralleling Celsius Crossover (Canadian Extreme Fire Behavior) or Fahrenheit Crossover (Southern US moisture of extinction).

Thanks
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
(1) The components of air all move together, in spite of the different masses of the molecules, so that a single figure of 20.95% for oxygen in dry air is serviceable in nearly all situations -- more of that later.

(2) The amount of water vapour in air is determined by the saturation vapour pressure at a particular temperature multiplied by the relative humidity. The SVP is accurately tabulated; there are algebraic expressions for SVP as a function of temperature, but I am not sure that any of them will be accurate enough for your intended purposes.

(3) When a particular loading of water vapour is introduced into a parcel of dry air, all components of the air will be equally "displaced", so that with y% water vapour, the oxygen content of standard air will be 20.95% * 100 / (100+y)

(4) Although air circulates and mixes evenly in principle, there is in practice quite a significant difference between, say, rural air and urban air, or indoor air and outdoor air, in oxygen content. If you are concerned with bushfire behaviour, particularly after a fire has started, the air that you are wanting to model may well have a greatly reduced oxygen content.

The standard dry atmosphere is a typical, ideal, or average concept.
 
What JohnRC wrote, plus amount of CO2 is not constant (just like oxygen), although concentration of CO2 is relatively small, so its effects can be below accuracy of your calculations.
 
Last edited:
For proportion of water vapour in air

p(H2O) atm = RH%/100 * 176160 * exp (-4057/(T°C + 236))

p(O2) atm = 20.95 * p(local)/{1 + p(H2O)/p(local)}

ratio water vapour: oxygen = p(H2O)/p(O2)

Be very careful with "standard pressure". I have taken it to be 101.3 kPa. Note that most aneroid barometers (needle on dial) have been adjusted to read local values of "mean sea level pressure", and the pressure indicated on the dial will be nowhere near the actual local pressure if you are at any significant altitude. You will need a pressure from a mercury barometer, or from a pressure reading multiplied by an altitude correction factor. If you have an accurate local reading for mean sea level pressure, the actual atmospheric pressure is given by

p(local) = p(MSL) * exp (-0.00013627 * h metre)
 
Get the red ink pen out.

I don’t know how to utilize the exponential function so start with that correction.
Thanks JohnRC for your help.


I’m in an atmosphere with a station pressure of 25 inHg (84.6595 kPa),
a dry bulb temperature of 60 degrees F (15.5555 C)
and a RH of 19%

p(H2O) atm = RH%/100 * 176160 * exp (-4057/(T°C + 236))

p(H2O) atm = .19 * 176160 * exp (-4057/(15.5555°C + 236))

p(H2O) atm = 33470.4 * (16.1276537)

p(H2O) atm = 539,799.02

- - - - - - - - -

p(O2) atm = 20.95 * p(local)/{1 + p(H2O)/p(local)}

p(O2) atm = 20.95 * 84.6595 / {1 + 539,799.02 / 84.6595}

p(O2) atm = 20.95 * .0132

p(O2) atm = .27



again appreciated
 
oh dear! I suspect a typo or two on my part. But perhaps not.

Conditions: 19% RH, 15.55°C

p(H2O) = 0.19 * 176160 * exp (-4057/251.55)
= 0.19 * 176160 * exp(–16.128)
= 33470 * 9.901 E -8
=0.003314 atm

The exponential function simply means the transcendental number e = 2.71828... raised to that power. If you are not using a spreadsheet or calculator that has the function inbuilt, then exp(-x) = e^(-x) = 10^(-x/2.3026...) and you can look it up in your "antilogarithm" tables.

To proceed any further, we need to know height above sea level and p(MSL) which will be the local "pressure" as recorded at a nearby weather station.

Suppose that the weather station has said 991 hPa for local MSL pressure and that the altitude is 1400 ft = 417 m

991 hPa = 991/1013.25 atm = 0.978 atm

p(local) = 0.978 * exp (-0.00013627 * 417) = 0.978 * exp (-0.0568) = 0.978 * 0.945
= 0.924 atm

p(O2) = 0.924 * 0.2095 / (1 + 0.003314/0.924) = 0.1936 / 1.00359
= 0.1929 atm

ratio = 0.003314/0.1929 = 1.72% or 1 in 58.2
 
OK;

Just to be sure before we go any further.

This
ratio = 0.003314/0.1929 = 1.72% or 1 in 58.2
is saying there is 1 molecule of water for every 58.2 molecules of O2 at that elevation (station pressure - the actual air pressure around you), temp and RH.
 
Last edited:
TedNugget said:
OK;

Just to be sure before we go any further.

This
ratio = 0.003314/0.1929 = 1.72% or 1 in 58.2
is saying there is 1 molecule of water for every 58.2 molecules of O2 at that elevation (station pressure - the actual air pressure around you), temp and RH.

Whoops! I have made a mistake. 1 in 58.2 would mean 1 molecule of water in 58.2 molecules of (oxygen or water)

I should have said 1 to 58.2,

which correctly describes the number of oxygen molecules that go with each water molecule.

(that would mean 1 in 59.2)
 
  • #10
You have sharpened your ink pen.
well done and thanks.

Now to dig out excel for this IMac.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K