MHB Ideals of formal power series ring

Anonymous2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I need help understanding the following solution for the given problem.

The problem is as follows: Given a field $F$, the set of all formal power series $p(t)=a_0+a_1 t+a_2 t^2 + \ldots$ with $a_i \in F$ forms a ring $F[[t]]$. Determine the ideals of the ring.

The solution: Let $I$ be an ideal and $p \in I$ such the number $a := \min\{i|a_i \neq 0\}$ is minimal. We claim $I=(t^a).$ First, $p=t^aq$ for some unit $q$, hence $(t^a) \subset I$. Conversely, any $r \in I$ has first nonzero coefficient at degree $\geq n$, hence $t^a=s$ for some $s \in F[[t]]$, and so $r \in (t^n)$.

My questions: Why the claim $I=(t^a)$? Why does $q$ have to be a unit? What does "first nonzero coefficient at degree $\geq n$ mean? And I don't understand the last part of the proof!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Anonymous said:
My questions: Why the claim $I=(t^a)$?

Just because the author knows what is the answer, he claims it and then prove it.

Anonymous said:
Why does $q$ have to be a unit?

In a formal power series ring, a series is invertible if and only if the constant term is invertible over the base ring, in this case, $F$ being a field implies a series is invertible (unit) if and only if its constant term is different from zero.

Anonymous said:
What does "first nonzero coefficient at degree $\geq n$ mean?

This is the same that saying $r=\displaystyle\sum_{i=n}^{\infty}a_{i}t^{i}$, but in fact $n$ should be an $a$, the next sentence make no sense, from here we can conclude $r\in (t^{a})$ and finish the proof.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top