MHB Ideals of formal power series ring

Anonymous2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I need help understanding the following solution for the given problem.

The problem is as follows: Given a field $F$, the set of all formal power series $p(t)=a_0+a_1 t+a_2 t^2 + \ldots$ with $a_i \in F$ forms a ring $F[[t]]$. Determine the ideals of the ring.

The solution: Let $I$ be an ideal and $p \in I$ such the number $a := \min\{i|a_i \neq 0\}$ is minimal. We claim $I=(t^a).$ First, $p=t^aq$ for some unit $q$, hence $(t^a) \subset I$. Conversely, any $r \in I$ has first nonzero coefficient at degree $\geq n$, hence $t^a=s$ for some $s \in F[[t]]$, and so $r \in (t^n)$.

My questions: Why the claim $I=(t^a)$? Why does $q$ have to be a unit? What does "first nonzero coefficient at degree $\geq n$ mean? And I don't understand the last part of the proof!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Anonymous said:
My questions: Why the claim $I=(t^a)$?

Just because the author knows what is the answer, he claims it and then prove it.

Anonymous said:
Why does $q$ have to be a unit?

In a formal power series ring, a series is invertible if and only if the constant term is invertible over the base ring, in this case, $F$ being a field implies a series is invertible (unit) if and only if its constant term is different from zero.

Anonymous said:
What does "first nonzero coefficient at degree $\geq n$ mean?

This is the same that saying $r=\displaystyle\sum_{i=n}^{\infty}a_{i}t^{i}$, but in fact $n$ should be an $a$, the next sentence make no sense, from here we can conclude $r\in (t^{a})$ and finish the proof.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
792
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K