Undergrad Identity involving exponential of operators

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving a specific formula from a physics paper, particularly equation (22). The key insight involves the operator identity that relates the differential operator $(\partial_x - \mathrm{i} e/\hbar By)$ to an exponential function of operators. By iterating this relationship, it is shown that for any natural number k, the operator can be expressed in terms of exponentials and derivatives of the function $\psi(\vec{x})$. This approach simplifies the derivation of the equation in question. The conclusion emphasizes the commutation relation $[\partial_x, y] = 0$ as a crucial aspect of the derivation.
thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
Hey all,
I saw a formula in this paper: (https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0011069.pdf), specifically equation (22):
1680505109627.png

and wanted to know if anyone knew how to derive it. It doesn't seem like a simple application of BCH to me.
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please use LaTeX to type formulae. It's much easier to read!

The trick is that
$$(\partial_x - \mathrm{i} e/\hbar By)\psi (\vec{x}) = \exp(\mathrm{i} e B x y/\hbar) \partial_x \left [\exp(-\mathrm{i} e B x y/\hbar) \psi(\vec{x}) \right]$$
for all ##\psi(\vec{x})## (in the domain of the operators applied ;-)).

By iteration it's further easy to see that for ##k \in \mathbb{N}##
$$(\partial_x - \mathrm{i} e/\hbar By)^k\psi (\vec{x}) = \exp(\mathrm{i} e B x y/\hbar) \partial_x^k \left [\exp(-\mathrm{i} e B x y/\hbar) \psi(\vec{x}) \right].$$
Plugging this into the series defining the operator exponential you get Eq. (22) of the paper.
 
  • Like
Likes thatboi, topsquark and gentzen
Or, leaving out a lot of details: ##[\partial _x, y] = 0##.

-Dan
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K