Ideology: Humanity’s Weakest Link

  • Thread starter Thread starter coberst
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Link
Click For Summary
Ideologies shape societal perspectives, often leading to a dominant viewpoint that prioritizes self-interest and emotional momentum over objective reasoning. This dominant ideology, particularly in the U.S., is characterized by capitalism, emphasizing production and consumption. Individuals within society often align with multiple ideologies, but emotionally charged beliefs can overshadow rational thought, leading to biased conclusions. Group dynamics can further distort individual reasoning, creating a "group mind" that suppresses personal conscience and promotes conformity. Ultimately, the interplay of ideology and group psychology reveals significant implications for understanding human behavior and societal structures.
  • #31
About studying, I'm implying that the learning process allows one to develop CT skills. Particularity, studying subjects where emphasis on problem solving and logical manipulation is maximum would accelerate the development of CT skills. What one learns does not matter much, but what is important is that you went through the process.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
waht said:
About studying, I'm implying that the learning process allows one to develop CT skills. Particularity, studying subjects where emphasis on problem solving and logical manipulation is maximum would accelerate the development of CT skills. What one learns does not matter much, but what is important is that you went through the process.

I think that studying math might improve logic, or studying science might improve one's empirical reasoning. But the problem is that coberst and others I've heard lump those things together along with fairness and impartiality (and attitude adjustment, as he says above) under "critical thinking" so that in their minds it seems to be a blanket term meaning "correct thinking" or "good thinking".

So consequently saying something like "studying improves your critical thinking", now that we have this elaborate and embellished definition of what "critical thinking" means, implies that studying makes you fairer and more impartial, which it does not.

I think that "critical thinking" has basically become a brand, with all of these books and videos and college courses, and hence the meaning of that plain English phrase has been muddled. That's why I think one ought to talk about logical deduction, or empirical reasoning, or fairness or impartiality separately. I actually think the whole "critical thinking movement" has dumbed down the way we talk about those things somewhat.
 
  • #33
Making good judgments is an important and complex matter. There are bad judgments, good judgments, and better judgments. To make better judgments requires many kinds of knowledge, skills, and character traits all working together.

Our schools and colleges are beginning to teach these things but it is an effort that is just beginning and it is a difficult one to accomplish.

Just to give you an idea of what CT is about I have copied the following info from the Internet:

This info was taken from workbooks for classes K-12. This list is found in the following handbooks: Critical Thinking Handbook: k-3, Critical Thinking Handbook: 4-6, Critical Thinking Handbook: 6-9, Critical Thinking Handbook: High School.


A. Affective Strategies
S-1 thinking independently
Thru
S-9 developing confidence in reason

B. Cognitive Strategies - Macro-Abilities
S-10 refining generalizations and avoiding oversimplifications
Thru
S-26 reasoning dialectically: evaluating perspectives, interpretations, or theories

C. Cognitive Strategies - Micro-Skills
S-27 comparing and contrasting ideals with actual practice
Thru
S-35 exploring implications and consequences

S-1 Thinking Independently

Principle: Critical thinking is independent thinking, thinking for oneself. Many of our beliefs are acquired at an early age, when we have a strong tendency to form beliefs for irrational reasons (because we want to believe, because we are praised or rewarded for believing). Critical thinkers use critical skills and insights to reveal and reject beliefs that are irrational.

S-2 Developing Insight Into Egocentricity or Sociocentricity

Principle: Egocentricity means confusing what we see and think with reality. When under the influence of egocentricity, we think that the way we see things is exactly the way things are. Egocentricity manifests itself as an inability or unwillingness to consider others' points of view, a refusal to accept ideas or facts which would prevent us from getting what we want (or think we want).

S-3 Exercising Fairmindedness

Principle: To think critically, we must be able to consider the strengths and weaknesses of opposing points of view; to imaginatively put ourselves in the place of others in order to genuinely understand them; to overcome our egocentric tendency to identify truth with our immediate perceptions or long-standing thought or belief.

S-4 Exploring Thoughts Underlying Feelings and Feelings Underlying Thoughts

Principle: Although it is common to separate thought and feeling as though they were independent, opposing forces in the human mind, the truth is that virtually all human feelings are based on some level of thought and virtually all thought generative of some level of feeling. To think with self-understanding and insight, we must come to terms with the intimate connections between thought and feeling, reason and emotion.

S-5 Developing Intellectual Humility and Suspending Judgment

Principle: Critical thinkers recognize the limits of their knowledge. They are sensitive to circumstances in which their native egocentricity is likely to function self-deceptively; they are sensitive to bias, prejudice, and limitations of their views. Intellectual humility is based on the recognition that one should not claim more than one actually knows. It does not imply spinelessness or submissiveness.

S-6 Developing Intellectual Courage

Principle: To think independently and fairly, one must feel the need to face and fairly deal with unpopular ideas, beliefs, or viewpoints. The courage to do so arises when we see that ideas considered dangerous or absurd are sometimes rationally justified (in whole or in part) and that conclusions or beliefs inculcated in us are sometimes false or misleading.

S-7 Developing Intellectual Good Faith or Integrity

Principle: Critical thinkers recognize the need to be true to their own thought, to be consistent in the intellectual standards they apply, to hold themselves to the same rigorous standards of evidence and proof to which they hold others, to practice what they advocate for others, and to honestly admit discrepancies and inconsistencies in their own thought and action. They believe most strongly what has been justified by their own thought and analyzed experience.

S-8 Developing Intellectual Perseverance

Principle: Becoming a more critical thinker is not easy. It takes time and effort. Critical thinking is reflective and recursive; that is, we often think back to previous problems to re-consider or re-analyze them. Critical thinkers are willing to pursue intellectual insights and truths in spite of difficulties, obstacles, and frustrations.

S-9 Developing Confidence in Reason

Principle: The rational person recognizes the power of reason and the value of disciplining thinking in accordance with rational standards. Virtually all of the progress that has been made in science and human knowledge testifies to this power, and so to the reasonability of having confidence in reason.

S-10 Refining Generalizations and Avoiding Oversimplifications

Principle: It is natural to seek to simplify problems and experiences to make them easier to deal with. Everyone does this. However, the uncritical thinker often oversimplifies and as a result misrepresents problems and experiences.

S-11 Comparing Analogous Situations: Transferring Insights to New Contexts

Principle: An ideas power is limited by our ability to use it. Critical thinkers' ability to use ideas mindfully enhances their ability to transfer ideas critically. They practice using ideas and insights by appropriately applying them to new situations. This allows them to organize materials and experiences in different ways, to compare and contrast alternative labels, to integrate their understanding of different situations, and to find useful ways to think about new situations.

S-12 Developing One's Perspective: Creating or Exploring Beliefs, Arguments, or Theories

Principle: The world is not given to us sliced up into categories with pre-assigned labels on them. There are always many ways to "divide up" and so experience the world. How we do so is essential to our thinking and behavior. Uncritical thinkers assume that their perspective on things is the only correct one. Selfish critical thinkers manipulate the perspectives of others to gain advantage for themselves.

S-13 Clarifying Issues, Conclusions, or Beliefs

Principle: The more completely, clearly, and accurately an issue or statement is formulated, the easier and more helpful the discussion of its settlement or verification. Given a clear statement of an issue, and prior to evaluating conclusions or solutions, it is important to recognize what is required to settle it. And before we can agree or disagree with a claim, we must understand it clearly.

S-14 Clarifying and Analyzing the Meanings of Words or Phrases

Principle: Critical, independent thinking requires clarity of thought. A clear thinker understands concepts and knows what kind of evidence is required to justify applying a word or phrase to a situation. The ability to supply a definition is not proof of understanding. One must be able to supply clear, obvious examples and use the concept appropriately. In contrast, for an unclear thinker, words float through the mind unattached to clear, specific, concrete cases. Distinct concepts are confused.

And so on

============================================================

S-33 Giving Reasons and Evaluating Evidence and Alleged Facts

Principle: Critical thinkers can take their reasoning apart in order to examine and evaluate its components. They know on what evidence they base their conclusions. They realize that un-stated, unknown reasons can be neither communicated nor critiqued. They are comfortable being asked to give reasons; they don't find requests for reasons intimidating, confusing, or insulting.

S-34 Recognizing Contradictions

Principle: Consistency is a fundamental-some would say the defining-ideal of critical thinkers. They strive to remove contradictions from their beliefs, and are wary of contradictions in others. As would-be fairminded thinkers they strive to judge like cases in a like manner.

S-35 Exploring Implications and Consequences

Principle: Critical thinkers can take statements, recognize their implications-what follows from them-and develop a fuller, more complete understanding of their meaning. They realize that to accept a statement one must also accept its implications. They can explore both implications and consequences at length. When considering beliefs that relate to actions or policies, critical thinkers assess the consequences of acting on those beliefs.

{This list is found in the following handbooks: Critical Thinking Handbook: k-3, Critical Thinking Handbook: 4-6, Critical Thinking Handbook: 6-9, Critical Thinking Handbook: High School.}

http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/envrnmnt/drugfree/sa3crit.htm

/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
Yeah, I know what it's about. I have taken a critical thinking class.
 
  • #35
CaptainQuasar said:
Yeah, I know what it's about. I have taken a critical thinking class.


I would be interested in some of the details of your class.

Was this in college or grade school or high school?

Did it teach the character traits such as honesty and fairmindedness?

Did it teach Logic 101?

I have been posting about CT for more than four years and seldom have I encountered someone who had a class in CT.
 
  • #36
coberst said:
I would be interested in some of the details of your class.

Was this in college or grade school or high school?

Did it teach the character traits such as honesty and fairmindedness?

Did it teach Logic 101?

I have been posting about CT for more than four years and seldom have I encountered someone who had a class in CT.

It was a college-level class, back in 1997 I think, here in the New England where I live. If I recall correctly the textbook was by http://www.criticalthinking.org/ABOUT/Fellow_Richard_Paul.cfm".

I would say its focus was on analysis and it didn't treat honesty and fairmindedness as a separate topic. Logic also was not a separate topic but was subsumed into the general discussion of critical thinking reasoning.

As you can undoubtedly tell, I was pretty unimpressed with the textbook, curriculum, and professor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
296
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
15K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
12K