If 8ab+7b+3a=c, whats the best way to figure out either a or b

  • Thread starter Thread starter clearwater304
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation 8ab + 7b + 3a = c for either a or b, it's important to recognize that there are infinitely many solutions, necessitating a free variable. By designating a as the free variable, b can be expressed in terms of a. Since a and b are integers and there is a unique solution for the equation to equal c, additional equations may be required to pinpoint specific values. The discussion also mentions the potential use of matrices or differential equations, although their direct applicability is questioned. Ultimately, finding another equation equal to c could be essential for determining specific integer values for a and b.
clearwater304
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
C is a known number, therefore I would only need to solve for a or b. Whats the best way to solve this, a few things come to mind, using a matrix or differential equations, but I'm not sure how they are applicable to this situation.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are infinitely many solutions. So you're going to have a free variable. So let a be the free variable, then you can easily solve for b.
 
I should have mentioned, a and b are integers, and there is only one solution for a and b to get c. I may be able to find another equation that is equal to c. Would I need this in order to solve the equation?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top