If [A,B]=0, are they both functions of some other operator?

In summary: X^{n}## is a vector space over the field of real numbers. So there does exist an operator X satisfying [A,B]=0, but it's not clear what it is.
  • #1
pantheid
53
0
In other words, if we are told that A and B commute, then does that mean that there exists some other operator X such that A and B can both be written as power series of X? My instinct is yes but I haven't been able to prove it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
pantheid said:
In other words, if we are told that A and B commute, then does that mean that there exists some other operator X such that A and B can both be written as power series of X? My instinct is yes but I haven't been able to prove it.
If you have ##[.,.]## defined as a multiplication with certain properties, it simply says ##[A,B]=0##, nothing more than this. However, we often have an additional multiplication ##A \cdot B## and define ##[A,B]=A\cdot B - B\cdot A##. This is often the case, but not automatically.

What ##A,B## are or where they're from depends on your example. They can be functions, matrices or whatever. Usually they are vectors, which is no contradiction as function and matrices can be vectors, too. Obviously we need a zero to make sense of the equation, and this naturally leads to vector spaces, resp. algebras.

Your question is settled somewhere in nowhere. I suspect that you confuse some concepts which cannot be condensed the way you suggest, but this is guesswork. So let me give an example: ##A,B \in \mathbb{R}## and ##A\cdot B## is the usual multiplication of real numbers. Then ##[A,B]=A\cdot B - B\cdot A = 0## for all choices of ##A,B##. Where do you see ##X## in here?
 
  • #3
Sometimes there's a tendency overcomplicate questions ...

My interpretation is that pantheid is asking if for two operators A,B (defined on a Hilbert space) satisfying [A,B] = AB - BA = 0 one can prove that there must exist some other operator X and two operator functions f,g with A = f(X) and B = g(X).
 
  • #4
tom.stoer said:
Sometimes there's a tendency overcomplicate questions ...

My interpretation is that pantheid is asking if for two operators A,B (defined on a Hilbert space) satisfying [A,B] = AB - BA = 0 one can prove that there must exist some other operator X and two operator functions f,g with A = f(X) and B = g(X).
The obvious answer is then yes unless you add additional requirements on the function. You just let ##f(X)## and ##g(X)## be constant functions equal to ##A## and ##B##, respectively.

Now, if you for example want the functions to be defined through power series in ##X## with scalar coefficients, that is a completely different issue and it is trivial to find counter examples.
 
  • #5
Orodruin said:
The obvious answer is then yes unless you add additional requirements on the function. You just let ##f(X)## and ##g(X)## be constant functions equal to ##A## and ##B##, respectively.

Now, if you for example want the functions to be defined through power series in ##X## with scalar coefficients, that is a completely different issue and it is trivial to find counter examples.
I got the impression that the power series the OP had in mind had scalar coefficients. In that case those constant functions would not be power series in the same operator unless one of A, B is a scalar multiple of the other.

EDIT: I just saw the second part of your post. For some reason I didn't register it at first, so the foregoing is probably not applicable, and it is the following that puzzles me:.

Can you offer a counter-example, because I couldn't think of one (assuming the operators are linear)? [so I hope it's not too trivial! :nb)]
 
  • #6
How about smooth functions in two variables as vector space and ##A=\frac{d}{dx}## and ##B=\frac{d}{dy}##. In this case I cannot see an ##X##.

But if we only take, what actually has been provided by the OP, who didn't mention any vector spaces at all, one can at least in the finite dimensional, and probably the countable cases say
$$
\mathbb{F}^n \cong \{A\,\vert \, [A,B]=0\} \cong \mathbb{F}[X]/(X^{n})
$$
 
Last edited:

1. What does [A,B]=0 mean?

[A,B]=0 means that the operators A and B commute, which means that their order does not matter when they are applied to a function.

2. Can A and B be any type of operator?

Yes, A and B can be any type of operator, as long as they follow the rules of commutation. This includes linear operators, differential operators, and more.

3. Does [A,B]=0 always mean that A and B are functions of some other operator?

No, [A,B]=0 does not always mean that A and B are functions of some other operator. It is possible for two operators to commute without being functions of another operator.

4. What is the significance of [A,B]=0 in quantum mechanics?

In quantum mechanics, [A,B]=0 is significant because it indicates that A and B are compatible observables. This means that they can be measured simultaneously with no interference.

5. How does the commutator [A,B] relate to the uncertainty principle?

The commutator [A,B] is related to the uncertainty principle through Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which states that the product of the uncertainties in two compatible observables, represented by A and B, cannot be smaller than a certain value. The commutator [A,B] is related to this value through a mathematical formula.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
713
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
791
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
931
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
33
Views
2K
Back
Top