Discussion Overview
The discussion centers on the mathematical statement regarding congruences: whether the equivalence \( a^3 \equiv b^3 \mod n \) implies \( a \equiv b \mod n \). Participants explore this concept through examples and counterexamples, examining both specific cases and general conditions.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Mathematical reasoning
Main Points Raised
- One participant asserts that the statement is false but struggles to provide a counterexample.
- Another participant provides a counterexample: \( 2^3 \equiv 4^3 \mod 8 \).
- A further example is presented showing \( 1^3 \equiv 2^3 \mod 7 \), indicating that the statement can fail even with prime moduli.
- Another participant cites \( 4^3 \equiv 10^3 \mod 13 \) as a non-trivial counterexample.
- One participant introduces a condition under which the statement holds: if 3 is coprime to \( \phi(n) \) and both \( a \) and \( b \) are coprime to \( n \), then \( a \equiv b \mod n \) follows, providing \( n = 17 \) as an example.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree that the statement does not hold universally, as evidenced by multiple counterexamples. However, there is a conditional agreement on specific cases where the statement may hold true.
Contextual Notes
Participants note that the validity of the statement can depend on the properties of \( n \) and the relationship between \( a \) and \( b \) with respect to \( n \). There are unresolved aspects regarding the implications of the conditions mentioned.