If ## a ## is an odd integer, then ## a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ##?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

If ## a ## is an odd integer, then ## a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ## is proven through algebraic manipulation. By expressing ## a ## as ## 2k+1 ##, it is shown that ## a^{2} = 4k(k+1) + 1 ##, where ## k(k+1) ## is the product of two consecutive integers, thus even. This leads to the conclusion that ## a^{2} = 8m + 1 ## for some integer ## m ##, confirming the modular equivalence. The discussion also addresses the case of ## a=1 ##, affirming that ## k(k+1) = 0 ## is indeed even.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with integer properties
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of even and odd integers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study modular arithmetic properties in depth
  • Explore proofs involving odd and even integers
  • Learn about algebraic identities and their applications
  • Investigate subgroup properties in integer sets
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in modular arithmetic and its proofs.

Math100
Messages
817
Reaction score
229
Homework Statement
Prove the assertion below:
If ## a ## is an odd integer, then ## a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ##.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

Suppose ## a ## is an odd integer.
Then ## a=2k+1 ## for some ## k\in\mathbb{Z} ##.
Note that ## a^{2}=(2k+1)^{2}=4k^{2}+4k+1=4k(k+1)+1 ##.
Since ## k(k+1) ## is the product of two consecutive integers,
it follows that ## k(k+1) ## must be even.
This means ## k(k+1)=2m ## for some ## m\in\mathbb{Z} ##.
Thus ## a^{2}=4(2m)+1=8m+1\implies a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ##.
Therefore, if ## a ## is an odd integer, then ## a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ##.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this is mostly correct, not sure if we should take separately the case ##a=1## (which is obvious that it holds) but for ##a=1## the ##k ## in the proof is zero so I am not sure if ##k(k+1)=0(0+1)=0## can be said to be even in this case.
 
Delta2 said:
I think this is mostly correct, not sure if we should take separately the case ##a=1## (which is obvious that it holds) but for ##a=1## the ##k ## in the proof is zero so I am not sure if ##k(k+1)=0(0+1)=0## can be said to be even in this case.
Why not? ##0=2\cdot 0## is even. It has to be since ##2\mathbb{Z}## is a subgroup of ##\mathbb{Z}.##
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K