If g o f = idA and f o g = idB, then g = f^-1 proof?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Norm850
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if two functions, f: A -> B and g: B -> A, satisfy the conditions g o f = idA and f o g = idB, then g is the inverse of f, denoted as g = f^-1. Participants emphasize the necessity of demonstrating that f is both one-to-one and onto to establish its invertibility. The proof involves showing that for any element a in A, f(a) yields a corresponding element b in B, and vice versa, confirming the relationship through function composition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of function composition in mathematics
  • Knowledge of the concepts of identity functions (idA, idB)
  • Familiarity with the definitions of one-to-one (injective) and onto (surjective) functions
  • Basic proof techniques in set theory and functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of injective and surjective functions in detail
  • Learn about the concept of function inverses and their proofs
  • Explore examples of invertible functions in set theory
  • Review the implications of the identity function in function composition
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and students studying abstract algebra or set theory, particularly those interested in function properties and proofs of invertibility.

Norm850
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I need to prove: Suppose A and B are sets, and f and g are functions with f: A -> B and g: B -> A. If g o f = idA and f o g = idB, then f is invertible and g = f^-1.

So far I have understood why g must be the inverse of f, but I do not know how to prove it.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take an arbitrary element a in A and b in B and show that they relate via composition of both functions.
 
Hint: f(a) = b, g(b) = a
 
tazzzdo said:
Take an arbitrary element a in A and b in B and show that they relate via composition of both functions.

Okay, not really sure how to do that but here's my attempt:

Suppose g o f = idA,
then dom(g o f) = dom(idA) = A
and (g o f)(a) = g(f(a)) = idA(a) = a.

Suppose f o g = idB,
then dom(f o g) = dom(idB) = B
and (f o g)(b) = f(g(b)) = idB(b) = b.
 
A function is only invertible if it's 1 - 1 and onto. Is this the case? You didn't specify.
 
tazzzdo said:
A function is only invertible if it's 1 - 1 and onto. Is this the case? You didn't specify.

So what I have is sufficient for g=f^-1? But first I need to show that f^-1 exists?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K