If Hackers Are So Skilled, Why Not Make $$$ w/ a Real Job?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kyphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    hackers Job
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the motivations behind individuals who engage in hacking activities instead of pursuing legitimate careers in programming or security consulting. It touches on various aspects including the ease of criminal activities, the nature of hacking, and societal perceptions of hackers.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that many hackers do have legitimate programming jobs and engage in criminal activities as a sideline.
  • Others argue that the financial incentives for hacking can be greater than those offered by legitimate jobs, citing examples of significant financial gains from cybercrime.
  • A few participants mention that some hackers may be motivated by social justice rather than financial gain.
  • There is a discussion about the varying definitions of "hacker," with some referring to skilled individuals and others to less experienced "script kiddies."
  • Some participants note that being highly skilled does not guarantee a high-paying job, and that many skilled individuals may remain unemployed.
  • Concerns are raised about the perception that hacking is an easy way to make money, with some suggesting that media portrayals contribute to this misunderstanding.
  • Several posts highlight specific high-profile hacking incidents to illustrate the complexities and risks involved in cybercrime.
  • There is mention of the ease with which some hackers can make mistakes, such as spelling errors, despite their technical skills.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the motivations and definitions of hackers, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus on the reasons behind hacking as a career choice.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to specific hacking incidents and societal perceptions, but lacks a clear framework for defining the skills and motivations of hackers, leading to ambiguity in the arguments presented.

kyphysics
Messages
686
Reaction score
446
Always wondered about this.

Why not just program or do security consulting?

Those jobs are pretty good pay, right? Why do they become criminals?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pepper Mint
Computer science news on Phys.org
By "hacker" you mean the umbrella term for people misusing their network access?

Many of them do actually have real programming jobs, they are following their criminal life as a sideline: but many are kids using bots made by other people ... the network equivalent of graffiti artists.
So you may as well be asking "if graffiti artists are so good, why not make loads of money as a real artist?"
Or maybe: if meth lab chemists are such good scientists, why not make loads of money as an industrial chemist rather than be criminals?

Then there is the issue: major hackers are criminals who are making lots of money off botnets and various scams, or they are employed by people who are making all that money. They do it because they are making more money with less effort than they would security consulting.

Contrary to what movies and TV tell you, the average "hacker" is not some wiz programmer turning their skills to evil for the lulz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hoophy, DrClaude, MexChemE and 3 others
Being a criminal is typically easier.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pepper Mint
kyphysics said:
Why not just program or do security consulting?
Who says they don't do both?

Those jobs are pretty good pay, right? Why do they become criminals?

Because http://www.pcworld.com/article/2082204/crime-pays-very-well-cryptolocker-grosses-up-to-30-million-in-ransom.html?
Or because it's not about money, a lot of hacking seems to be done out of a sense of social justice (rightly or wrongly), like the Panama papers or the upcoming Wikileak that'll (supposedly) incriminate Hillary Clinton.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pepper Mint
Oh ... and being highly skilled does not guarantee you a high paying job.
Highly skilled and no job does guarantee you lots of free time though...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pepper Mint
Cons and criminals working in groups. A random group of teens could be considered to have a collective high-skill set that is comparable to that of one hacker. Being one hacker implies at least an average intelligence. These people that have tried to persuade me over the phone (in broken english) to let them upgrade my PC are off their rockers.
 
kyphysics said:
Always wondered about this.

Why not just program or do security consulting?

Those jobs are pretty good pay, right? Why do they become criminals?
You probably missed this story:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/philipp...hacking-of-bangladesh-bank-account-1457887306

A group of hackers managed to transfer more than $80 million from Bangladeshi accounts held at the US Federal Reserve to other bank accounts in the Philippines and at least one account in Sri Lanka. Almost $1 billion in other attempted transfers were blocked by the Fed's security system.

The hackers used an internal messaging system of the Fed to make the transfers, and presented the correct passwords and authentication codes. Apparently what tripped the hackers up was that they were transferring the stolen funds to personal accounts overseas, rather than to commercial accounts.

Even getting away with only $80 million tax-free would be quite a coup. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pepper Mint
Back in college a friend of mine was talking about comic books. He asked, "Why doesn't the bad guy who makes the superweapon sell it to the government?"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: StatGuy2000, russ_watters and Pepper Mint
kyphysics said:
Why not just program or do security consulting?
Those jobs are pretty good pay, right? Why do they become criminals?
You think governments around the world do not "hack" into foreign country systems.
Lawful employment is available.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fervent Freyja and billy_joule
  • #11
SteamKing said:
The hackers used an internal messaging system of the Fed to make the transfers, and presented the correct passwords and authentication codes. Apparently what tripped the hackers up was that they were transferring the stolen funds to personal accounts overseas, rather than to commercial accounts.
I read recently, (Don't remember site but it was a "Mainstream" news feed) that another tip off was a glaringly obvious case of misspelling one word. Interesting that someone or group was "good enough" to hack the passwords yet couldn't keep their grammar straight.
 
  • #12
1oldman2 said:
I read recently, (Don't remember site but it was a "Mainstream" news feed) that another tip off was a glaringly obvious case of misspelling one word. Interesting that someone or group was "good enough" to hack the passwords yet couldn't keep their grammar straight.
A lot of the run-of-the-mill fishing scams have this flaw, like misspelling the word "bank" or something stupid.

The Fed heist was apparently a lot more sophisticated if the hackers had access to internal security codes and passwords.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
  • #13
A few groups make a headlining score (or get caught doing it) and everyone thinks they can do it too ... like hearing jackpot bells in a casino.

It should probably be pointed out that the media use of "hacker" includes teenagers with a script - we used to call these script kiddies - and such like, while programmers tend to think of hackers closer to the gnu/usernet useage.
ie. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/hacker

When I studied computer science at college, the terms was used to refer to people who coded by the seat of their pants, without a plan or a diagram etc.
The implication is that the result is not good code ... as in "cobbled together". However, elsewhere the term referred to competence and an attitude of inquirey... as in "I can hack it."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fervent Freyja
  • #14
russ_watters said:
Being a criminal is typically easier.

Is it that easy to steal millions of bucks and get away with it through hacking?
Simon Bridge said:
A few groups make a headlining score (or get caught doing it) and everyone thinks they can do it too ... like hearing jackpot bells in a casino.

It should probably be pointed out that the media use of "hacker" includes teenagers with a script - we used to call these script kiddies - and such like, while programmers tend to think of hackers closer to the gnu/usernet useage.
ie. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/hacker

When I studied computer science at college, the terms was used to refer to people who coded by the seat of their pants, without a plan or a diagram etc.
The implication is that the result is not good code ... as in "cobbled together". However, elsewhere the term referred to competence and an attitude of inquirey... as in "I can hack it."

What level of education would a typical hacker need, in order to hack, say, the U.S. government's information?
 
  • #15
1oldman2 said:
I read recently, (Don't remember site but it was a "Mainstream" news feed) that another tip off was a glaringly obvious case of misspelling one word. Interesting that someone or group was "good enough" to hack the passwords yet couldn't keep their grammar straight.
SteamKing said:
A lot of the run-of-the-mill fishing scams have this flaw, like misspelling the word "bank" or something stupid.
This can be done on purpose. Only a tiny fraction is stupid enough to be of value for the mail senders - they don't want to waste time with all the others who might react to a better written mail, but ultimately not reveal anything of worth.

@kyphysics: we don't give career guidance for illegal activities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fervent Freyja

Similar threads

  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K