If one wanted to become a theoretical Physcist

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theoretical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the educational pathway for aspiring theoretical physicists, particularly the choice between pursuing a PhD in pure mathematics or a PhD in physics. Participants suggest that a PhD in mathematics, especially in areas like topology, may provide a stronger foundation for understanding advanced concepts in theoretical physics. However, it is also noted that if the primary goal is to engage in physics, a physics PhD supplemented with mathematics is advisable. The importance of selecting a strong program with active seminars in both fields is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of theoretical physics concepts, particularly string theory.
  • Familiarity with advanced mathematics topics such as topology and abstract algebra.
  • Knowledge of academic pathways in physics and mathematics.
  • Awareness of the distinction between physics and applied mathematics departments.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the curriculum and requirements for a PhD in pure mathematics with a focus on topology.
  • Explore the structure and content of a PhD program in theoretical physics.
  • Investigate the resources available at institutions with strong theoretical physics and mathematics departments.
  • Review the works and contributions of notable physicists like Gerardus t'Hooft and Amanda Peet in string theory.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for aspiring theoretical physicists, mathematics students considering a focus on physics, and educators guiding students in their academic choices. It provides insights into the interplay between mathematics and physics in advanced theoretical studies.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
There is so much mathematics in theoretical physics these days such as string theory that it may be hard to distinguish mathematicians from theoretical physicst, although this lack of distinction applied to Newton and others as well.

My question is would you recommand an (average level intelligent) future theoretical physicst to do a Phd in pure mathematics (related to physics such as topology) and go back to physics once the mathematics has been mastered. Or do a Phd in physics and pick up the higher level mathematics such as Topology, abstract algebra etc

Considering that this person is not a genius than I presume that the former (Phd in math) is a better choice since it is much harder to learn higher level mathematics by one self compared with picking up a physics textbook without any fear of the mathematics in it and ready to absorb all the physics inside. But I could be wrong. Any suggestions.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check out this site from Nobel laureate Gerardus t'Hooft

regards
marlon
 
Most of the theoretical physicists at my university are actually in the maths department. But it depends on what you want to do with it that matters
 
In my opinion,...

wherever you go should be strong and active (especially regarding seminars) in both mathematics and physics.

(Depending of where you study, it seems "theoretical physics" is done in either "physics" departments, as one would expect, or in "applied mathematics" departments, like http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/ )

if your real goal is physics, I'd choose a physics path supplemented by mathematics. I would suggest the reverse if you had a very specific problem in mind and felt that a math path would teach you what you really needed to know for that specific problem.


If you are interested in string theory, Amanda Peet's page may be helpful
http://www.physics.utoronto.ca/~peet/home/straightdope.html .
There's also Warren Siegel's entertaining pages
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/prep.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/curriculum.html .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K